[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: For mirroring, try to run one output at its native display, then scale the other

2012-05-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 Title: For mirroring, try to run one output at its n

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173]

2012-05-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Merged upstream now in the kernel are extended modes, so hopefully we will be able to pick a better mode. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 Title: For mirroring, try t

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resolution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9)

2012-02-22 Thread Bryce Harrington
What we've talked about doing in libxrandr-utils for situations that have differing aspect ratios would be to place black bars on one display so they can have similar effective resolutions. I think your concept fits with that idea generally. Moving this to the server for now since we don't have a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resolution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9)

2011-11-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 1 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43189. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resolution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9)

2011-11-23 Thread Achim Bohnet
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #43189 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43189 ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43189 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resolution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9)

2011-11-23 Thread Achim Bohnet
** Summary changed: - [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9) + [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resolution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] [GT2+] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays (ditto for 16:9)

2011-11-22 Thread Achim Bohnet
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log of Sandy Bridget GT2+ and 16:9" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/437173/+attachment/2604883/+files/Xorg.0.log ** Tags added: oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is su

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-11-22 Thread Achim Bohnet
Bug is still in oneiric. Additional HW combination 16:9 that shows the same bug : Dell Latitude E6620,Native: 16:9 1366*768 (Sandybridge Mobile (GT2+)) via HDMI Dell 27'' U2710 Res: 1920x1080 (16:9) Same bug: Instead of using native laptop resolution and scaling extern monitor up to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-11-22 Thread Achim Bohnet
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 Title: [GM45] Bad resulution cho

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-11-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
Hey allee, You filed this bug report against natty, but I see it's still open and doesn't appear to have much activity recently. So, now that oneiric is released and stable, this may be a good point for you to upgrade and re-test if this issue is still present there. If it's solved in the new r

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-04-28 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Tags added: natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 Title: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays __

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-04-28 Thread Achim Bohnet
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 Title: [GM45] Bad resulution cho

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-04-28 Thread Achim Bohnet
Yes, the bug is still in natty. Dell E6500 1400x900 and Dell U2410 1920x1200 both have aspect 16/10. Still, first common resolution algorithm is used, despite the fact that in this case a 4/3 one is the first math and both displays are therefore either scaled/black-bordered. ==> Visually ugly

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2011-04-27 Thread bugbot
This bug report was filed against an old version of Ubuntu. Can you confirm whether this is still an issue in natty? Please also ensure this bug has tags for each Ubuntu release that the bug is confirmed as affecting. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => N

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2010-05-04 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
While I agree that this could be better, this is not something we can fix in ubuntu or just ask upstream to fix. Two possible approaches that may have some chance of reaching the people who actually implement this: - File a bug on bugs.freedesktop.org (Product: DRI, Component: DRM/intel) - Join a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2010-03-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed: - [g45] [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays + [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays -- [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [g45] [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2010-03-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed: - [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays + [g45] [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays -- [g45] [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 You receive

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-10-09 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel With two 16:10 displays, a Dell Latitude E6500 laptop (1440 x 900) and a Dell 24'' TFT ( 1920 x 1200), the intel gfx driver chooses the 4:3 resolution of 1024x748 for both. Visual result is a low 4:3 transformed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-10-08 Thread 7oby
The original algorithm and motivation for Initial Mode Selection Keith Packard explained in this blog: http://keithp.com/blogs/X_output_status_july_2008/ I agree your solution is better. -- [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4371

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-10-01 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
** Tags added: gm45 karmic resolution -- [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu. ___

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-09-28 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-x

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-09-26 Thread Achim Bohnet
Here the xrandr output of the choosen default mirror: kdm startup, shows greeter, remote ssh login: (0)alle...@alleehol:~$ sudo DISPLAY=:0 XAUTHORITY=/var/run/xauth/A:0-I29Hrw xrandr [sudo] password for allee-k: Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 8192 x 8192 VGA1 disconnec

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] Re: [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-09-26 Thread Achim Bohnet
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32486135/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32486136/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32486137/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 437173] [NEW] [GM45] Bad resulution choice for mirror mode with two 16:10 displays

2009-09-26 Thread Achim Bohnet
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel With two 16:10 displays, a Dell Latitude E6500 laptop (1440 x 900) and a Dell 24'' TFT ( 1920 x 1200), the intel gfx driver chooses the 4:3 resolution of 1024x748 for both. Visual result is a low 4:3 transformed to fullscreen 1