[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 537481] Re: radeonhd package should conflict with fglx driver

2010-03-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
Actually I think the alternatives system alberto has implemented for mesa in lucid solves this issue nicely. However, I *don't* know that it's been implemented for radeonhd. But we're not really supporting radeonhd any further since all its capabilities should now be in -ati. ** Changed in: fglr

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 537481] Re: radeonhd package should conflict with fglx driver

2010-03-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- radeonhd package should conflict with fglx driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537481 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 537481] Re: radeonhd package should conflict with fglx driver

2010-03-12 Thread Tormod Volden
There would probably be the same conflict between fglrx and the -ati driver. In theory it should be possible to have both drivers installed. The fglrx package should take care that the fglrx module is only loaded if the fglrx driver is going to be used. The xorg drivers do not have any conflicts

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 537481] Re: radeonhd package should conflict with fglx driver

2010-03-12 Thread Bryce Harrington
Hi Mike, Please attach the output of `lspci -vvnn` and `dmesg`, and attach your /var/log/Xorg.0.log (and maybe Xorg.0.log.old) file from after reproducing this issue. If you're using a custom /etc/X11/xorg.conf please attach that as well. [This is an automated message. Apologies if it has re