Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc

Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly. >> Any suggestions how to improve it? > > remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them? Yes. The assembly language isn't really parseable otherwise. >>> Don't like the dl_find_hash_mod v.s dl_find_hash thingy.

Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc

On 27/11/2007, Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly. > >> Any suggestions how to improve it? > > > > remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them? > > Yes. The assembly language isn't really parseable othe

RE: FD-PIC patches for uClibc

> -Original Message- > From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 27 november 2007 13:07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'uClibc'; 'Alexandre Oliva' > Subject: Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly. > >> Any su

Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc

Joakim Tjernlund a écrit : >> -Original Message- >> From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: den 27 november 2007 13:07 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: 'uClibc'; 'Alexandre Oliva' >> Subject: Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc >> >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > The 02_underscores

Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc

Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > The 02_underscores patch is really ugly. Any suggestions how to improve it? >>> remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them? >> Yes. The

Patch for Maverick Crunch support

This patch adds MAVERICK CRUNCH FPU support for the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 Procs. diff -burN uClibc-0.9.29.org/libm/math_private.h uClibc-0.9.29/libm/math_private.h --- uClibc-0.9.29.org/libm/math_private.h 2006-03-22 22:00:25.0 +0200 +++ uClibc-0.9.29/libm/math_private.h 2007-08