On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Tobias Poschwatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:33:52PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> I can not reproduce it on a eabi system and there has been few changes
>> in this file. I do not have oabi system to test against. Can you try
>> same on eabi
make check runs extra/scripts/install_kernel_headers.sh which fails if
include/asm-generic is missing (e.g. in linux-libc-headers-2.6.9.1).
I don't think this check is needed, since asm-generic is only copied
if present (there's another check in l. 57). The following trivial
patch removes the firs
Hi,
__syscall_rt_sigaction should accept kernel_sigaction instead on
sigaction, as declared into the bit/kernel_sigaction.h header.
Indeed, each libc function that invoke it, are passing a
kernel_sigaction pointer.
Attached patch tries to fix it.
Cheers,
Carmelo
Index: libc/sysdeps/linux/commo
Hi,
Attached 72_all_uClibc-0.9.29-linuxthreads.patch is from gentoo as in
http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=5134
Can somebody who is involved with threads take a look?
--- a/libpthread/linuxthreads.old/attr.c 2006-01-24 12:41:01.0 -0500
+++ b/libpthread/linuxthreads.old/attr.c 2008-02-10
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached 72_all_uClibc-0.9.29-linuxthreads.patch is from gentoo as in
> http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=5134
> Can somebody who is involved with threads take a look?
The patch is against linuxthread
Quoting Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The tests are still
>> failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than
>> before :-) .>
>
> Is it the lseek issue ?
No, it has something to do with the way the parameters to the system
call are being passed into the kernel. I get stra
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Vallevand, Mark K
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, here's the patch I used to fix the memory leak.
>
> --- old/ldso/libdl/libdl.c 2008-09-17 08:42:34.0 -0500
> +++ uClibc/ldso/libdl/libdl.c 2008-09-16 15:14:44.0 -0500
> @@ -632,6 +632,13 @@
This patch was intended to fix a memory leak, not the count overflow.
We still have some problem in that area. We resolved it by not calling
dlopen() dlclose() but rather calling dlopen() just once and reusing the
handle.
Regards.
Mark K Vallevand
We old folks have to find our cushions and pill
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:49:54AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>Bernhard Reutner-Fischer schreef:
>> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed I've few pending patches to push that may be worth
>>> including in .30 release.
I plan to roll an -rc2 during the
Hi,
I see even though uclibc implemented clock_gettime(clock_id, tp), it
does not support clock type of CLOCK_MONOTONIC. So if I want some
kind of monotonic time which should not changed by user process ( such
as setting of date), what should I do?
Thanks.
-
narke
__
10 matches
Mail list logo