Quoting Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> The tests are still >> failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than >> before :-) .> > > Is it the lseek issue ?
No, it has something to do with the way the parameters to the system call are being passed into the kernel. I get strange values for advice. It looks as though there is a problem with the size of an int/long or byte ordering, or something. It's the same problems I saw before (mentioned in a previous post) but with the latest patch, the advice value is different. I think I will have to follow Carmelo's suggestion and port the glibc code. -Corinna Schultz IBM LTC _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
