I /just/ build want to build uclibc. So no interest in installing or
using it then?
Basically -- except for the startup code.
I'm using uclibc, for sure, just not the .so files that I build.
Not until I get up the gumption (or extra hardware to risk) to install the
resulting file system
On Monday 17 November 2008 08:27, Чинков Андрей wrote:
I am interested what does the message a.out: can't resolve symbol
__cxa_atexit mean?
I try to compile s11n C++ serialization framework for mipsel target
platform.
It compiles and builds OK but when I run my a.out I get this message:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:40:57PM +0800, Cheng bin wrote:
Hi All:
Firstly thanks a lot for your time.
I am a new player with cross-compiler, I just went through the way of
constructing a cross-compiler using uclibc for mips32,
and of course with linux as its os. After all of this, I
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:57:41AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Sometime ago I removed string.h related libc_hidden_proto's.
There were a few bumps, but nothing tragic.
So now it sits half-done, something like:
...
/* Experimentally off -
Hello!
I am building a cross-toolchain targeting mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc,
using GCC 4.3.2, binutils 2.19, linux kernel 2.6.27.6, uclibc 0.9.30.
I had to patch libpthread/linuxthreads.old/sysdeps/mips/pt-machine.h
to get it to build (basically, removing the static definition of
_test_and_set
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Brett Neumeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am building a cross-toolchain targeting mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc,
using GCC 4.3.2, binutils 2.19, linux kernel 2.6.27.6, uclibc 0.9.30.
I had to patch libpthread/linuxthreads.old/sysdeps/mips/pt-machine.h
to get it
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:58:44PM -0600, Brett Neumeier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Brett Neumeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am building a cross-toolchain targeting mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc,
using GCC 4.3.2, binutils 2.19, linux kernel 2.6.27.6, uclibc 0.9.30.
I had to patch
