Re: 0.9.32 plans/TODOs

2010-04-08 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 4/2/2010 7:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: EHLO - austin has brought nptl up to snuff with master. Thanks! - -std=gnu89 (before merge/after/not ?) I fear that certain folks will wince if we (we're well in 2010 at the time of this writing and C99 is the dominating standard for

Re: problems with gnu make and stdout with uclibc nptl

2010-04-08 Thread Natanael Copa
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:04:54AM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Austin Foxley aust...@cetoncorp.com wrote: On 04/03/2010 11:13 AM, Natanael Copa wrote: which means that stdout

Re: problems with gnu make and stdout with uclibc nptl

2010-04-08 Thread Natanael Copa
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: Does it still happen if you build master with LT_OLD and O0 (i.e. DODEBUG set)? Enabling runtime assertions did give an interesting result: make: libc/stdio/_stdio.c: 326: _stdio_validate_FILE: Assertion

Re: 0.9.32 plans/TODOs

2010-04-08 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 4/8/2010 10:08 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:01:53AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Another point: as you know we are going to complete the work to add prelink support to uClibc: what about putting it in this plan ? Or do you think it's better to postpone