Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: On 16/12/11 15:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: I was able to fix the

Re: [git commit] buildsys: add cppcheck wrapper script

2012-01-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 19 January 2012 04:09, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: also, i had a copy paste typo.  that - should be a =.        : ${REAL_CC:=gcc} I think i found the correct one now and also incooperated this suggestion of yours; see 7f02033e13b1633d83403664749c1daf0ab98840 Since it takes

Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/01/2012 12.13, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: On 16/12/11 15:57,

Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:17:25PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Well, what I'd expect to have for sigaction is: libc.{so,a} --- __libc_sigaction (global) --- sigaction (weak alias of __libc_sigaction) --- __GI_sigaction (hidden alias for internal use, if any) and

Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/01/2012 15.55, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:17:25PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Well, what I'd expect to have for sigaction is: libc.{so,a} --- __libc_sigaction (global) --- sigaction (weak alias of __libc_sigaction) --- __GI_sigaction (hidden

Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/01/2012 14.17, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 27/01/2012 12.13, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100,

Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Jan 27, 2012 4:47 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote: So, to summarise I'd expect libc.{so,a} --- __libc_sigaction (global) --- __GI_sigaction (hidden alias for internal use) --- sigaction a. A wrapper to __libc_sigaction (if NPTL configured) b. A

Re: static link with NPTL on ARM fails

2012-01-27 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
On 27/01/2012 16.54, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Jan 27, 2012 4:47 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote: So, to summarise I'd expect libc.{so,a} --- __libc_sigaction (global) --- __GI_sigaction (hidden alias for internal use) --- sigaction a. A wrapper

Re: [git commit] buildsys: use single slash version of -print-whatever

2012-01-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 26 January 2012 11:00:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: The double slash variants are not documented (doc bug?) so better use the single slash variants like we usually do. -$(eval $(call cache-output-var,CC_IPREFIX,$(CC) --print-file-name=include)) +$(eval $(call

linux-3.2.*, iptables, linux/if_packet.h, and '__aligned_u64' compile problem

2012-01-27 Thread Kevin Day
In the 3.2 linux kernel series, the structure tpacket_hdr_v1 was added to linux/if_packet.h. Inside of that structure, the following variable was defined: __aligned_u64 seq_num; While compiling iptables 1.4.12.2 on a x86_64 system with the headers from the said kernel installed, I get the

Re: linux-3.2.*, iptables, linux/if_packet.h, and '__aligned_u64' compile problem

2012-01-27 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Day thekevin...@gmail.com wrote: In the 3.2 linux kernel series, the structure tpacket_hdr_v1 was added to linux/if_packet.h. Inside of that structure, the following variable was defined: __aligned_u64   seq_num; While compiling iptables 1.4.12.2 on a