On 27/01/2012 16.54, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012 4:47 PM, "Carmelo AMOROSO" <carmelo.amor...@st.com> wrote:
>
>> So, to summarise I'd expect
>>
>> libc.{so,a}
>> ---> __libc_sigaction (global)
>> ---> __GI_sigaction (hidden alias for internal use)
>> ---> sigaction
>> a. A wrapper to __libc_sigaction (if NPTL configured)
>> b. A weak alias to __libc_sigaction (thread none)
>
> I think that should be a strong alias if NO_THREADS.
indeed.. not expected to be overridden.
>>
>> and nothing duplicated into libpthread.
>>
>> make more sense ?
>
> Yes.
>
:)
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
