Re: 0.33.1-rc1 - problem with compile

2012-05-03 Thread Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 02 May 2012 15:15:08 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: hello. i get following error : LD libuClibc-0.9.33.1.so libc/libc_so.a(brk.os): In function `brk': brk.c:(.text+0x2f): undefined reference to `__emutls_get_address' libc/libc_so.a(cl

Re: gentoo once again

2012-05-03 Thread Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:15:54 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Peter Korsgaard wrote: "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes: is there still any problem with udev? try it out and let us know ;) Mike> i just emerged it on my syst

Re: Option UCLIBC_STRICT_HEADERS

2012-05-03 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 2 May 2012 13:29, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: > I think the descriptive text for the option UCLIBC_STRICT_HEADERS (Enable > structures and constants for unsupported features) has a negative logic I tried to clarify this in 81bd17ac76f0c64c518d9ca541a874b603e61fa0 Thanks! > regarding what the

Re: gentoo once again

2012-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 03 May 2012 04:08:12 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 May 2012 14:15:54 Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes: > >> is there still

Re: [git commit] rpmatch: make decl parsable

2012-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 03 May 2012 04:58:24 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Mike, it would have been much simpler to just leave the header impl-free yes, and it would cause unused bloat in the C lib. the func is dirt simple, so for the rare case where someone actually calls this, they get a few memory l

restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we can exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main repo. maybe start a new toplevel git repo and add it to uClibc.git as a

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated > anywhere.  any suggestions on where to restore these ?  i'm not sure we can > exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main > repo.  maybe

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 03 May 2012 23:10:00 Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated > > anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we > > can exclude subdirs when using `git

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > my concern isn't history, it's the 11MB footprint (7.5 when compressed in a > tarball) mostly due to the pdfs.  we don't want to include that in the release > tarball when that's only 2.7MB right now. yes it occured to me later. I think h

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hi, We could stick them in the website repo. What do you think? On 4 May 2012 07:14, "Khem Raj" wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > my concern isn't hist... yes it occured to me later. I think having a separate docs repo makes sense then _

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 04 May 2012 02:00:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > We could stick them in the website repo. > What do you think? add a new "Specs" link under Documentation ? and have the uclibc/docs/ subdir have a small text file pointing people there ? sounds like it can work. i'll gather all t