On Sunday 26 October 2008 14:38:42 Christian MICHON wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
> >>what are the compilers prerequisite for this release ?
> >>(it seems gcc-3.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
>
>>what are the compilers prerequisite for this release ?
>>(it seems gcc-3.4.6 is not supported anymore)
>
> I'm usually using the current relea
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
>what are the compilers prerequisite for this release ?
>(it seems gcc-3.4.6 is not supported anymore)
I'm usually using the current release. gcc-3.x is not supported since
quite some time now. If it works for you then fine, otherw
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I know - we have taken our time. After quite a long period of
> general improvement all over the place we are pleased to announce
> uClibc-0.9.30-rc2.
>
> The release candidate 2 can be downloaded a
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:47 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
[...]
> I note that libtool is a complete NOP on any ELF linux system. There's
> nothing for it to do. The fact that libtool can't competently do _nothing_
> without screwing up things like cross compiling is a damning indictment of
> the e
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 14:01 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Vladimir Dronnikov
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> You can use a gentoo stage3 tarball, chroot and it just works.
>> >
>> >
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 14:01 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Vladimir Dronnikov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> You can use a gentoo stage3 tarball, chroot and it just works.
> >
> > Is it true that gentoo is uClibc-based?
>
> what is the size of a stage3 gentoo
On Monday 20 October 2008 16:51:22 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:17:06PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> >On Monday 20 October 2008 03:39:38 Natanael Copa wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 09:48 +, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >> > Still bison and flex (and evil gettex
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:17:06PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Monday 20 October 2008 03:39:38 Natanael Copa wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 09:48 +, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
>> > Still bison and flex (and evil gettext) binaries are must-pre-have on
>> > the host system.
>>
>> You can do pr
On Monday 20 October 2008 05:01:05 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> > You can use a gentoo stage3 tarball, chroot and it just works.
>
> Is it true that gentoo is uClibc-based?
The normal gentoo isn't, but gentoo embedded is:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/
However, they don't use the re
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2008 03:39:38 Natanael Copa wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 09:48 +, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
>> > >>> > supply a cross compiler for the host system?
>> > >>
>> > >> It's pretty trivial...
>> >
>> >
On Monday 20 October 2008 03:39:38 Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 09:48 +, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> > >>> > supply a cross compiler for the host system?
> > >>
> > >> It's pretty trivial...
> >
> > Pity that noone ships a tarball of x86 toolchain which could be just
> > untarre
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Vladimir Dronnikov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You can use a gentoo stage3 tarball, chroot and it just works.
>
> Is it true that gentoo is uClibc-based?
what is the size of a stage3 gentoo ? :)
>
>> You can do pretty much without gettext.
>
> Pity, buildroot d
>
> You can use a gentoo stage3 tarball, chroot and it just works.
Is it true that gentoo is uClibc-based?
You can do pretty much without gettext.
Pity, buildroot does need it. Of course I can patch it but I really got
tired of patching... :) To have a local patch means a constant headache,
e
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 09:48 +, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >>> > supply a cross compiler for the host system?
> >> It's pretty trivial...
>
> Pity that noone ships a tarball of x86 toolchain which could be just
> untarred to the rootfs and has out-of-box means to build, say,
> buildroot for x8
>
> > Had to patch it slightly.
> Details? (I'm interested in fixing upstream.)
Attached. It became reentrant and doesn't require special setting of PATH
when chrooted.
> toybox patch ... just fails if it didn't apply _cleanly_
>
> in general if your patch _needs_ that the patch should be fixed
2008/10/19 Vladimir Dronnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I now can not afford downloading 60Mb as I am using a dialup line:(
> I'll try it tomorrow. But still can you extract only toolchain into a
> separate package while leaving rootfs stuff aside?
I've an older release of DetaolB (v0.3 around 17Mb,
> "Rob" == Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> C) Buildroot doesn't have releases. I'd be happy to try to
Rob> debug a _specific_ release of buildroot, but they've
Rob> categorically refused to ever do this. (I've argued about it
Rob> before.)
No promises, but I'm still trying
On Sunday 19 October 2008 04:48:21 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >>> > supply a cross compiler for the host system?
> >>
> >> It's pretty trivial...
>
> Pity that noone ships a tarball of x86 toolchain which could be just
> untarred to the rootfs and has out-of-box means to build, say,
> buildroot fo
We're wandering a bit away from uClibc here, I'm going to start cc:ing this to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and drop the uclibc cc: next batch of messages.
On Sunday 19 October 2008 04:03:15 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> > chroot-setup.sh
>
> Had to patch it slightly.
Details? (I'm interested in fixing upst
I now can not afford downloading 60Mb as I am using a dialup line:(
I'll try it tomorrow. But still can you extract only toolchain into a
separate package while leaving rootfs stuff aside?
TIA,
--
Vladimir
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http:/
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Vladimir Dronnikov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> supply a cross compiler for the host system?
>>> It's pretty trivial...
>
> Pity that noone ships a tarball of x86 toolchain which could be just
> untarred to the rootfs and has out-of-box means to build, say,
>
>>> > supply a cross compiler for the host system?
>> It's pretty trivial...
Pity that noone ships a tarball of x86 toolchain which could be just
untarred to the rootfs and has out-of-box means to build, say,
buildroot for x86. Cross compiling is indeed very important task but
native tools are of
> chroot-setup.sh
Had to patch it slightly.
Can't use mini-native as external toolchain for building Bernhard's buildroot:
tools/gcc/include if out of -I path. toybox patch doesn't understand -d dir and
-E options; it can be easily fixed in buildroot patch-kernel.sh. But toybox
patch just fails
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Did you ever get around to adding any non-x86 targets, and do you supply
>> > a cross compiler for the host system?
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> no, not yet. It's in the todo list.
>
> It's pretty trivial. It only took me about tw
On Saturday 18 October 2008 13:28:20 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> Hello, Rob!
>
> > The mini-native tarballs...
>
> I could not chroot to it cleanly. Will be continuing testing...
Ah, sorry: chroot dirname /tools/bin/bash
or: chroot dirname /tools/bin/chroot-setup.sh
(The tarballs I have up are b
On Saturday 18 October 2008 06:03:20 Christian MICHON wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> don't forget there's also a linux live distro based on uclibc-0.9.29
> >> which contains compilers c/c++/fortran and dependencies to develop
> >> with uclibc.
Hello, Rob!
> The mini-native tarballs...
I could not chroot to it cleanly. Will be continuing testing...
> The cross-compiler...
0) Looks that it is what I need!
1) They are statically linked -- that is great!
2) They miss bison/flex/autotools -- can you add them?
3) I can't get configure script
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> don't forget there's also a linux live distro based on uclibc-0.9.29
>> which contains compilers c/c++/fortran and dependencies to develop
>> with uclibc.
>
> Did you ever get around to adding any non-x86 targets, and do yo
On Saturday 18 October 2008 02:59:28 Christian MICHON wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 October 2008 05:15:41 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:01:58PM +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2008 05:15:41 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:01:58PM +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >Where from can I download fresh rootfs for x86? Or this is not sup
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 05:15:41 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:01:58PM +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Where from can I download fresh rootfs for x86? Or this is not supported
> >any more?
>
> I have this:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/
>
> I
Good evening All!
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 22:24:12 Rob Landley wrote:
> Ok, I say Bernhard's maintainer now. He puts out releases.
[--SNIP--]
> I point out the following exchange, which occurred between him and me on
> the #uclibc channel on freenode today
[--SNIP--]
> I say we shanghai him.
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 04:51:13 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I know - we have taken our time. After quite a long period of
> general improvement all over the place we are pleased to announce
> uClibc-0.9.30-rc2.
Ok, I say Bernhard's maintainer now. He puts out releases.
E
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:15 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:01:58PM +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Where from can I download fresh rootfs for x86? Or this is not supported
> >any more?
>
> I have this:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/
>
> I'
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:01:58PM +0400, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Where from can I download fresh rootfs for x86? Or this is not supported
>any more?
I have this:
http://repo.or.cz/w/buildroot.git/
I'd be glad to get help to provide fresh root filesystems that can be
used with qemu, _in
Hi,
Yes, I know - we have taken our time. After quite a long period of
general improvement all over the place we are pleased to announce
uClibc-0.9.30-rc2.
The release candidate 2 can be downloaded as usual from
http://uClibc.org/
The output of svn log -r18564:HEAD svn://uClibc.org/trunk/uClibc h
37 matches
Mail list logo
