Re: Doing a release?

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello all, > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:57:09 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:49:44 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> > Dear uClibc developers, >> > >> > The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over

Re: Doing a release?

Hello all, On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:57:09 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:49:44 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Dear uClibc developers, > > > > The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year > > ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvement

Re: Doing a release?

> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer writes: Hi, > So, consider current master tip -rc point buildroot to use > http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/snapshot/uClibc-0e03ac5a6c4265fb4ddcdcbf5fdc9f20bcbef203.tar.bz2 > and verify if that works for the arches buildroot supports. I did a quick te

Re: Doing a release?

up and get merged before doing a release. Let's release 0.9.34 with the current feature set, and plan a 0.9.35 release not too late after that with the ARC port and Xtensa NPTL support added, for example. Given that NPTL support for Xtensa is ready to go (Baruch did actually also a lot of work),

Re: Doing a release?

On 7 November 2013 12:01, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Vineet Gupta, > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:54:40 +, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> I'm in complete agreement with you. What I intended to say was there's no >> point >> delaying uClibc release for a feature since the features itself can still on

Re: Doing a release?

Hello Thomas and others, On 06/11/2013 21:20, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > It's just that I think feature-based releases is a never-ending story. > The current feature set hasn't moved too much for a while, so it would > be good to make a release out of it, and as soon as 0.9.34-rc1 is out, > re-open

Re: Doing a release?

Dear Vineet Gupta, On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:54:40 +, Vineet Gupta wrote: > I'm in complete agreement with you. What I intended to say was there's no > point > delaying uClibc release for a feature since the features itself can still on > tip > and still be available with mechanism such as thos

Re: Doing a release?

On 11/07/2013 03:28 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Vineet Gupta, > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:18:17 +, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >>> It's just that I think feature-based releases is a never-ending story. >>> The current feature set hasn't moved too much for a while, so it would >>> be good to make

Re: Doing a release?

Dear Vineet Gupta, On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:18:17 +, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > It's just that I think feature-based releases is a never-ending story. > > The current feature set hasn't moved too much for a while, so it would > > be good to make a release out of it, and as soon as 0.9.34-rc1 is out

Re: Doing a release?

wait >>> indefinitely for more and more features to show up and get merged >>> before doing a release. Let's release 0.9.34 with the current feature >>> set, and plan a 0.9.35 release not too late after that with the ARC >>> port and Xtensa NPTL support add

Re: Doing a release?

Dear czankel, On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:05:02 -0800, czankel wrote: > > I've seen both the ARC port (from Vineet) and the Xtensa NPTL support > > (from Chris), but I don't think the uClibc community should wait > > indefinitely for more and more features to show up and g

Re: Doing a release?

e ARC port (from Vineet) and the Xtensa NPTL support (from Chris), but I don't think the uClibc community should wait indefinitely for more and more features to show up and get merged before doing a release. Let's release 0.9.34 with the current feature set, and plan a 0.9.35 release not too

Re: Doing a release?

Hi Khem, Very cool! Can you explain a bit how you want to handle patches in general? What's the development model using patchwork? (Note that I already committed the following patches:xtensa: fix atomic_decrement_if_positive() return value ) Thank

Re: Doing a release?

On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:23 AM, czankel wrote: > Hi Khem, > > On 11/6/13 11:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> >> i have been preparing setup to test the outstanding patches which now i have >> i think most of the changes arent affecting core as m

Re: Doing a release?

Hi Khem, On 11/6/13 11:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: i have been preparing setup to test the outstanding patches which now i have i think most of the changes arent affecting core as much so can vbe tried for the release Do you have a list of thos

Re: Doing a release?

fully have a 0.9.34 release soon > after that? > > I've seen both the ARC port (from Vineet) and the Xtensa NPTL support > (from Chris), but I don't think the uClibc community should wait > indefinitely for more and more features to show up and get merged > before doing a re

Re: Doing a release?

ibc community should wait indefinitely for more and more features to show up and get merged before doing a release. Let's release 0.9.34 with the current feature set, and plan a 0.9.35 release not too late after that with the ARC port and Xtensa NPTL support added, for example. Thanks, Thomas --

Re: Doing a release?

Hi Il 20 settembre 2013 11:37:47 Sedat Dilek ha scritto: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> Dear Khem Raj, >> >> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> > > It'd be really nice if uClibc a

Re: Doing a release?

Il 20 settembre 2013 08:41:25 Rich Felker ha scritto: On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Khem Raj, > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent > > > release schedule, to more ea

Re: Doing a release?

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> Dear Khem Raj, >> >> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> > > It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent >> > > release schedule, to m

Re: Doing a release?

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Khem Raj, > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent > > > release schedule, to more easily allow downstream users to benefit > > > from imp

Re: Doing a release?

Dear Khem Raj, On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent > > release schedule, to more easily allow downstream users to benefit > > from improvements/fixes. > > I think, if we decide to do releases biannually maintainin

Re: Doing a release?

On Sep 17, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear uClibc developers, > > The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year > ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the > master branch that would be interesting to have in a release. At the

Re: Doing a release?

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Florian Fainelli > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> 2013/9/18 Carmelo Amoroso : >>> >>> >>> Il 18 settembre 2013 06:49:44 Thomas Petazzoni >>> ha scritto: Dear uClibc developers, >>> >>> Hi Thomas >>>

Re: Doing a release?

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello, > > 2013/9/18 Carmelo Amoroso : >> >> >> Il 18 settembre 2013 06:49:44 Thomas Petazzoni >> ha scritto: >>> >>> Dear uClibc developers, >>> >> >> Hi Thomas >> >> >>> The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a y

Re: Doing a release?

Hello, 2013/9/18 Carmelo Amoroso : > > > Il 18 settembre 2013 06:49:44 Thomas Petazzoni > ha scritto: >> >> Dear uClibc developers, >> > > Hi Thomas > > >> The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year >> ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the

Re: Doing a release?

Il 18 settembre 2013 06:49:44 Thomas Petazzoni ha scritto: Dear uClibc developers, Hi Thomas The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the master branch that would be interesting to have in a rel

Doing a release?

Dear uClibc developers, The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the master branch that would be interesting to have in a release. At the Buildroot level, we now have 53 patches in your patch stack agains