No one made further comments regarding the second set of patches, so
I've now made another pass over them to fix a few problems and style
issues, and checked them in.
A few minor issues remain to be resolved to get the Blackfin support
100% working, and the FRV needs attention as well. I'll be wo
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> with the solution proposed into the nptl branch, you can keep the caller
> of _dl_find_hash always the same. Where the extra tpnt parameter is not
> required,
> independently from TLS or FDPIC code, like into ldso.c to lookup
> some function (malloc), you can safely pass NU
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>
>> please have a look at the nptl branch where already is the updated
>> _dl_find_hash
>> for NPTL using the same extra parameter you need. There is also a wrapper
>> around it as suggested by Jocke.
>> I think there is a way to use the interface fo
Hi, Bernd,
Thanks for pushing these patches out!
On Nov 29, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -char *_dl_find_hash(const char *name, struct dyn_elf *rpnt, struct
> elf_resolve *mytpnt, int type_class)
> +char *_dl_lookup_hash(const char *name, struct dyn_elf *rpnt,
> +
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> please have a look at the nptl branch where already is the updated
> _dl_find_hash
> for NPTL using the same extra parameter you need. There is also a wrapper
> around it as suggested by Jocke.
> I think there is a way to use the interface for nptl into your case.
> In th
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly.
Any suggestions how to improve it?
>>> remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them?
>> Yes. The
Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: den 27 november 2007 13:07
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Cc: 'uClibc'; 'Alexandre Oliva'
>> Subject: Re: FD-PIC pa
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 27 november 2007 13:07
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'uClibc'; 'Alexandre Oliva'
> Subject: Re: FD-PIC patches for uClibc
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >&g
On 27/11/2007, Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly.
> >> Any suggestions how to improve it?
> >
> > remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them?
>
> Yes. The assembly language isn't really parseable othe
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly.
>> Any suggestions how to improve it?
>
> remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them?
Yes. The assembly language isn't really parseable otherwise.
>>> Don't like the dl_find_hash_mod v.s dl_find_hash thingy.
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 22:59 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Did a quick scan of the patches and came up with these comments:
>
> While they tell me what you dislike, they don't really provide much in
> the way of alternatives.
Yes, sorry for the negative tone. Was in
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Did a quick scan of the patches and came up with these comments:
While they tell me what you dislike, they don't really provide much in
the way of alternatives.
> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly.
Any suggestions how to improve it?
> Don't like the dl_find_hash
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernd Schmidt
> Sent: den 25 november 2007 15:08
> To: uClibc
> Cc: Alexandre Oliva
> Subject: FD-PIC patches for uClibc
>
> These are the FD-PIC patches necessary
These are the FD-PIC patches necessary to get ld.so working on the
Blackfin. These were originally written by Alex Oliva for the FRV and
updated to work with current uClibc sources by myself.
I'm posting these for review; I intend to check them in in a few days if
there are no objections.
Note t
14 matches
Mail list logo