On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
... Also, in my experience _Bool is about as real-world useful as the
bit field notation with the colons, and is really there to keep the
language pedants and the c++ guys happy without actually accomplishing
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 13:46:19 Chris Gray wrote:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 08:54:50 Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
It can produce more readable, less error-prone C code though. We use
hardware register definitions such as
typedef struct {
unsigned int x : 8;
unsigned int y : 8;
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 15:44:42 Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 05:51:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:54:50AM +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
... Also, in my experience _Bool is about as real-world useful
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 03:47:03 Mike Frysinger wrote:
while the memory leakage needs to be addressed, the answer isnt with
alloca. the spec states that it must be via malloc(), but even ignoring
that, it also states that the caller must call free() on the returned
pointer. obviously
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 15:44:42 Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 05:51:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:54:50AM +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
... Also, in my experience _Bool is about as real-world useful
-Original Message-
From: uclibc-boun...@uclibc.org [mailto:uclibc-boun...@uclibc.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Frysinger
Sent: den 28 oktober 2009 09:02
To: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: Quick and dirty malloc() support for realpath.
[ cut ]
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ char got_path
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 04:57:01 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
From: Mike Frysinger
[ cut ]
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ char got_path[];
while (*path != '\0' *path != '/') {
if (new_path max_path) {
__set_errno(ENAMETOOLONG);
+
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:12:55AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 04:57:01 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
From: Mike Frysinger
better but the prototype part is missing (and a note that this
particular func now adheres to SUSv4 base, eventually)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: den 28 oktober 2009 10:13
To: Peter Kjellerstedt
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: Quick and dirty malloc() support for realpath.
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 04:57:01 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
From: Mike
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:21:39PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
did you want me to commit then ?
Please do.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 08:54:50 Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
It can produce more readable, less error-prone C code though. We use
hardware register definitions such as
typedef struct {
unsigned int x : 8;
unsigned int y : 8;
unsigned int control_bit : 1;
unsigned int dummy1 :
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:54:50 Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
... Also, in my experience _Bool is about as real-world useful as the
bit field notation with the colons, and is really there to keep the
language pedants and the c++ guys happy without
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 05:51:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:54:50AM +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
... Also, in my experience _Bool is about as real-world useful as
the bit field notation with the colons, and is really
On Sunday 25 October 2009 15:19:49 Rob Landley wrote:
- int readlinks = 0;
+ int readlinks = 0, allocated = 0;
...
+ if (!got_path) {
+ got_path = alloca(PATH_MAX);
+ allocated++;
+ }
...
+ if (allocated) got_path = strdup(got_path);
it doesnt
On Monday 26 October 2009 07:20:23 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009 15:19:49 Rob Landley wrote:
- int readlinks = 0;
+ int readlinks = 0, allocated = 0;
...
+ if (!got_path) {
+ got_path = alloca(PATH_MAX);
+ allocated++;
+ }
...
+ if
Add cheesy malloc() support to realpath(). Still limited to PATH_MAX, but eh.
diff -ur uClibc/libc/stdlib/realpath.c uClibc.new/libc/stdlib/realpath.c
--- uClibc/libc/stdlib/realpath.c 2008-06-04 09:02:56.0 -0500
+++ uClibc.new/libc/stdlib/realpath.c 2009-10-25 13:17:42.0
16 matches
Mail list logo
