Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-07 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 03:02:54 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > That said, I'm with Rob on that tagging and branching in SVN isn't > really something that's manageable. But currently we are stuck > with SVN... I'm all for tagging. Putting a label on a specific version we cut a release from is fi

RE: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-07 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 14:31 > To: Peter Kjellerstedt > Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org > Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material. > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0200,

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 06 October 2008 07:31:09 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > >Not sure if I made myself clear, but I was meaning tagging -rc2 > >(i.e., just like the old tag tags/uClibc_0_9_29_rc1 for 0.9.29rc1). > > what for? > > trunk

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 06 October 2008 07:12:34 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > >And do not forget to actually tag the release in the repository... > > The release will be tagged and will be copied to a new stable branch, > yes. Just FYI,

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 06 October 2008 03:24:19 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > >For what it's worth, using the linuxthreads.old stuff, the 10/04 nightly > > Unfortunately i have _no_ idea what revision that would be. Each snapshot contains all t

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >Not sure if I made myself clear, but I was meaning tagging -rc2 >(i.e., just like the old tag tags/uClibc_0_9_29_rc1 for 0.9.29rc1). what for? trunk is in kind of bugfix-only mode ATM and the rc's are extremely short lived. ___

RE: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 14:13 > To: Peter Kjellerstedt > Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org > Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material. > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200,

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: >And do not forget to actually tag the release in the repository... The release will be tagged and will be copied to a new stable branch, yes. ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org

RE: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 10:24 > To: Rob Landley > Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org > Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material. > > On Sun, Oct 05, 20

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >For what it's worth, using the linuxthreads.old stuff, the 10/04 nightly Unfortunately i have _no_ idea what revision that would be. >snapshot built for armv4l, armv5l, i586, i686, x86-64, m68k, mips, mipsel, >sh4, powerpc, and sparc