-O0 compilation of lockf() yields undefined reference to _Unwind_resume [was Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7]

2013-03-22 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 15 March 2013 16:05, Alexander Varnin fenix...@mail.ru wrote: I've faced problem mentioned in this half-year old thread http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2012-August/046997.html This is IIRC -O0 compilation of lockf() leaving a call to _Unwind_resume, right? Is there any

RE: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-15 Thread Alexander Varnin
I've faced problem mentioned in this half-year old thread http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2012-August/046997.html Is there any suggestions, what to do, to fix it? ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org

Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-11 Thread Alexey Zaytsev
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Alexey Zaytsev alexey.zayt...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Dubey, Abhishek

Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Alexey Zaytsev
@uclibc.org Subject: RE: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7 Sent: Aug 29 '12 00:02 Thanks. Did you intend to say that we should provide a dependency of libgcc_eh.a while building the uclibc.so? The problem is coming while compiling uclibc itself not while compiling an application. Abhishek

Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Dubey, Abhishek abhishek.du...@vanderbilt.edu wrote: Building uclibc 3.3.2 with debugging and NPTL using the gcc 4.7.1 compiler leads to the following unresolved symbols. libc/libc_so.a(lockf.os): In function `__GI_lockf':

Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Alexey Zaytsev
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Dubey, Abhishek abhishek.du...@vanderbilt.edu wrote: Building uclibc 3.3.2 with debugging and NPTL using the gcc 4.7.1 compiler leads to the following unresolved symbols.

Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Alexey Zaytsev alexey.zayt...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Dubey, Abhishek abhishek.du...@vanderbilt.edu wrote: Building uclibc 3.3.2 with debugging and NPTL using the

RE: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2013-03-08 Thread Dubey, Abhishek
, Abhishek; uclibc@uclibc.org Subject: Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7 On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Alexey Zaytsev alexey.zayt...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Dubey, Abhishek abhishek.du

Re: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7

2012-08-27 Thread liaoxinglong
make sure you linked with libgcc_eh.a, both of these two symbols in libgcc_eh.a xinglong ---Original Message--- From: Dubey, Abhishek abhishek.du...@vanderbilt.edu To: uclibc@uclibc.org uclibc@uclibc.org Subject: uclibc 3.3.2 with gcc-4.7 Sent: Aug 28 '12 02:17 Building