Hi,
The following patches are still outstanding since Nov '13. It would be
great if someone could approve them or give feedback. These generic
changes are required to add NPTL support for Xtensa.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/288804/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/288805/
Thanks,
-Chr
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:10 AM, czankel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following patches are still outstanding since Nov '13. It would be great
> if someone could approve them or give feedback. These generic changes are
> required to add NPTL support for Xtensa.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/288804
The hashcode handling code never accesses the underlying structure
'struct funcdesc_value', but only operates on pointer to pointers,
so we can use void** instead.
Also, pass in the functions to generate and compare a hash entry.
This is a minor functional change to inject functio
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:23:06AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> The hashcode handling code never accesses the underlying structure
> 'struct funcdesc_value', but only operates on pointer to pointers,
> so we can use void** instead.
No you can't. This is an aliasing v
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 11/6/13, 9:27 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:23:06AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
The hashcode handling code never accesses the underlying structure
'struct funcdesc_value', but only operates on pointer to pointers,
so we ca
Zankel wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 11/6/13, 9:27 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:23:06AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
The hashcode handling code never accesses the underlying structure
'struct funcdesc_value', but only operates on pointer to pointers,
On 13 January 2014 17:18, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had a chance to look at these changes again? I
> have attached the two patches we propose so we can add support for TLS
> descriptors.
>
> It would be great to get an ACK for it (or NACK with maybe some other
> sugge
Hi Bernhard,
On 1/22/14, 2:15 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 13 January 2014 17:18, Chris Zankel wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had a chance to look at these changes again? I
have attached the two patches we propose so we can add support for TLS
descriptors.
It would be great t
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:11:26PM -0800, Chris Zankel wrote:
> On 1/22/14, 2:15 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >On 13 January 2014 17:18, Chris Zankel wrote:
> >>I was wondering if anyone had a chance to look at these changes again? I
> >>have attached the two patches we propose
Move the hashcode handling code inside the ldso/fdpic/dl-inlines.h
to a header file (include/inline-hashtab.h), without any functional
changes.
This is in preparation for supporting TLS descriptors, which also
uses that code.
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
---
ldso
10 matches
Mail list logo
