On Monday 02 June 2008 11:55, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > Thanks. The attached patch fixes it (I applied it to uclibc svn).
>
> These patches are not self-explanatory. Could you provide some
> information about the cause of the failures, and how your patches fix them?
The p
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Thanks. The attached patch fixes it (I applied it to uclibc svn).
These patches are not self-explanatory. Could you provide some
information about the cause of the failures, and how your patches fix them?
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
On Friday 30 May 2008 23:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:55:03PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >On Friday 30 May 2008 20:35, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:57:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >Author: vda
> >> >Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:55:03PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>On Friday 30 May 2008 20:35, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:57:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Author: vda
>> >Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
>> >New Revision: 22012
>> >
>> >Log:
>>
On Friday 30 May 2008 20:35, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:57:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Author: vda
> >Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
> >New Revision: 22012
> >
> >Log:
> >Moving libc_hidden_proto's into #ifdef UCLIBC_INTERNAL block
> >in str
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:57:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Author: vda
>Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
>New Revision: 22012
>
>Log:
>Moving libc_hidden_proto's into #ifdef UCLIBC_INTERNAL block
>in string.h and strings.h. This caught unguarded string ops in
>libc/inet/e
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernhard
> Fischer
> Sent: den 20 maj 2008 23:02
> To: Denys Vlasenko
> Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org; Peter S. Mazinger
> Subject: Re: svn commit: trunk/uClibc: include libc/inet libc/ine
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:56:02PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>Possibly. Pthreads seems to need some cleanups...
Let's obsolete it with nptl, so just the bare minimum needed to get the
old code to somewhat behave, imho.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 22:46, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:35, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >> > >which should change nothing - __pthread_initialize is not
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:35, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> > >which should change nothing - __pthread_initialize is not mentined
>> > >anywhere else
>> > >in forward.i.c - and run
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:35, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > >which should change nothing - __pthread_initialize is not mentined
> > >anywhere else
> > >in forward.i.c - and run the second command - it will NOT warn!
> > >
> > >Looks like gcc bug
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >which should change nothing - __pthread_initialize is not mentined anywhere
> >else
> >in forward.i.c - and run the second command - it will NOT warn!
> >
> >Looks like gcc bug to me.
>
> hmz. I'll try to reproduce this sometimes in the nex
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >P.S. I am getting tons of warnings like this:
>
> I've fixed those earlier today, please svn up and holler if you still
> get alot of them (a *few* undefined tokens are expected, ATM)
Thanks.
It got much better. With attached .config, I am
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 09:08, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: vda
> > Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
> > New Revision: 22012
> >
> > Log:
> > Moving libc_hidden_proto's into #ifdef UCLIBC_INTERNAL block
> > in string.h and strings.h. This caught ung
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:40:19PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>I can reproduce it. In fact, there is a hint in
>libpthread/linuxthreads.old/forward.c
>that something is fishy here:
>
>#include
>#include
>#include
>
>/* psm: keep this before internals.h */ <==
>libc_hidden_proto(
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:03, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:57:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Author: vda
> >Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
> >New Revision: 22012
> >
> >Log:
> >Moving libc_hidden_proto's into #ifdef UCLIBC_INTERNAL block
> >in st
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 03:57:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Author: vda
>Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
>New Revision: 22012
>
>Log:
>Moving libc_hidden_proto's into #ifdef UCLIBC_INTERNAL block
>in string.h and strings.h. This caught unguarded string ops in
>libc/inet/e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: vda
> Date: 2008-05-19 15:57:34 -0700 (Mon, 19 May 2008)
> New Revision: 22012
>
> Log:
> Moving libc_hidden_proto's into #ifdef UCLIBC_INTERNAL block
> in string.h and strings.h. This caught unguarded string ops in
> libc/inet/ethers.c __ether_line_w() function.
18 matches
Mail list logo
