i dont really understand your statement anyways as the current mainline
uclinux-dist already supports multiple arches. like arm or coldfire or mips
...
Of course you are right. I just wanted to express that it would seems
funny to me to combine the two of Blackfin and NIOS while others are
It does take some effort to do the merge. But we get more when we can
share.
So you _do_ plan a merge ?!?!?!
looks like fun :=)
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
Hao Shen wrote:
Hello, all,
I would like to have an SMP uClinux running on the multilple NIOS II
processors architecture (with or without cache coherence).
You might want to discuss this on the NIOS2 uCLinux mailing list:
nios2-...@sopc.et.ntust.edu.tw .
Did you already solve the
Michael Schnell wrote:
It does take some effort to do the merge. But we get more when we can
share.
So you _do_ plan a merge ?!?!?!
Yes. You give us this great idea.
The maintainer of blackfin uclinux has kindly granted me to commit to
their svn repo. I will study and proceed to the merge.
Hello, Michael,
For the hardware part, there are two possible solutions:
1. If the data access of cache is not the bottleneck, we can
continue work without the data cache.
2. If it's really the bottleneck of the system, there are a paper
(Symmetric Multiprocessing on Programmable Chips Made
Michael Schnell wrote:
I would like to have an SMP uClinux running on the multilple NIOS II
processors architecture (with or without cache coherence).
You might want to discuss this on the NIOS2 uCLinux mailing list:
nios2-...@sopc.et.ntust.edu.tw .
Did you already solve the appropriate
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jamie Lokier ja...@shareable.org wrote:
Michael Schnell wrote:
I would like to have an SMP uClinux running on the multilple NIOS II
processors architecture (with or without cache coherence).
You might want to discuss this on the NIOS2 uCLinux mailing list:
Michael Schnell wrote:
(adding support for MMU, so, PIC, and XIP).
You don't need an MMU for PIC or XIP.
-- Jamie
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by
Hi,
loody wrote:
Dear all:
my questions are:
1. I saw there is mmu support in uclinux kernel config.
If I select it, what is the difference between uclinux and normal kernel?
If you select it you get a normal virtual memory linux kernel.
(Generally speaking uClinux are the patches/changes
On Friday 13 February 2009 03:27:36 Michael Schnell wrote:
i dont really understand your statement anyways as the current mainline
uclinux-dist already supports multiple arches. like arm or coldfire or
mips ...
Of course you are right. I just wanted to express that it would seems
funny
On Friday 13 February 2009 09:34:21 Thomas Chou wrote:
The blackfin has gcc4 already. I have tried the new nios2mmu gcc4, and I
didn't see big issue.
gcc-4.1 is the stable version now for the Blackfin port. gcc-4.3 is our
experimental version and hopefully will become our stable version over
Hi Michael,
Michael Schnell wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
ive tried convincing the uClinux-dist guys to use some of the
methodologies that we've adopted in the Blackfin uClinux dist, but it
doesnt look like it's going to happen, so ive given up :/
Mike, Thomas, Greg.
I always wondered why
On Friday 13 February 2009 01:29:03 Greg Ungerer wrote:
Michael Schnell wrote:
What is the cause a reunion is not planned ?
Anyone is welcome to send patches to this list for uClinux-dist
at any time... (But of course they may or may not end up being
included after consideration).
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
