Jivin Dave Rensberger lays it down ...
> >uClinux-dist supports anything (MMU and !MMU).
>
> >
> >The kernel in the latest uClinux-dist's is as close to the kernel.org
> >eleases as possible.
> >
> >uClinux-dist even lets you add your own kernel easily. For example,
> >take the "penguinppc" kern
tom gogh wrote:
> As I mentioned in my mail to Greg, I want to check how MMU and noMMU
> can make difference.
Good idea, especially on the same hardware. The results will be
interesting.
> I feel noMMU might give better performance.
Probably, but only a small improvement and some kernel operat
>uClinux-dist supports anything (MMU and !MMU).
>
>The kernel in the latest uClinux-dist's is as close to the kernel.org
>eleases as possible.
>
>uClinux-dist even lets you add your own kernel easily. For example,
>take the "penguinppc" kernel, extract it to a directory at in the dists top
>level
Hello all,
The latest distribution I can find (uClinux-dist-20090618.tar.gz) still
has version 5.2.1 of net-snmp. I've created a table based agent (using
the table_dataset code) but it's really, really slow when I do snmpset
on anything other than trivially small tables.
The documentation suggest
Hi Michael,
I don't have visibility of application at this point. But, right now I just
want to get hw board booting.
As I mentioned in my mail to Greg, I want to check how MMU and noMMU
can make difference. I feel noMMU might give better performance.
But, whatever loooks more lucrative to so
Thanks Greg for reply.
I am looking for PPC first and hopefully other arch as I continue.
Also, I am trying to have both MMU and noMMU because my understanding is noMMU
might give better performance and better timing predictability (no
VM exceptions for dynamic memory allocation).
Definitely grea
Thank David for clarifying this!
MMU and !MMU support definitely makes everything easy for software and
maintainability.
I will definitely love to make doc and if possible, make contribution
to uClinux through bug fixes or any patches if I encounter during my work.
Regards,
Tom
--- On Fri, 9/4/0
Hi all,
The current ISP1362 HCD of linux do not support ISO transfer mode.
is there a version of isp1362 hcd supporting ISO mode or have someone
developed such a patch?
thanks
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.
tom gogh wrote:
> Which means, if I use MMU/noMMU in both cases, I need to do less rework or
> no rework and easy software maintanability.
Are you targeting userland software or Kernel Work ?
"Normal" userland software should not be greatly affected by the MMU.
A common problem here is "fork(
Hi Tom,
tom gogh wrote:
I am facing classic dilemma of which distribution to go for.
I have powerpc with mmu, MIPS, may be in future some other processor like ARM
and I want to keep my code portable to multiple arch.
Which means, if I use MMU/noMMU in both cases, I need to do less rework
Jivin tom gogh lays it down ...
> Hello everyone,
> I am facing classic dilemma of which distribution to go for.
> I have powerpc with mmu, MIPS, may be in future some other processor like ARM
> and I want to keep my code portable to multiple arch.
> Which means, if I use MMU/noMMU in both
Hi Philippe,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:20:36PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
The arch trees of m68k and m68knommu have different structures. What will
the structure of the merged tree look like ?
I haven't given that too much thought yet. Most likely it would
follow th
12 matches
Mail list logo
