Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On 29/04/16 05:10, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > Greg Ungerer wrote,
> >
> >> Hi Angelo,
> >>
> >> On 20/04/16 04:14, angelo wrote:
> >>> infinite thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Do you maybe have also the
> >>> gcc-5.3.0-fix-libgcc-build.patch ?
>
Hi Waldemar,
On 29/04/16 05:10, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Greg Ungerer wrote,
>
>> Hi Angelo,
>>
>> On 20/04/16 04:14, angelo wrote:
>>> infinite thanks.
>>>
>>> Do you maybe have also the
>>> gcc-5.3.0-fix-libgcc-build.patch ?
>>
>> Yep, attached.
>
> Can you explain why this patch
Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,
> Hi Angelo,
>
> On 20/04/16 04:14, angelo wrote:
> > infinite thanks.
> >
> > Do you maybe have also the
> > gcc-5.3.0-fix-libgcc-build.patch ?
>
> Yep, attached.
Can you explain why this patch is required and why
the atomic code failes to compile?
Do you mind to