I was told that uClinux applications can't allocate memory in chuncks larger
then 1 MiB. Is this true? I have an application that requires significanly
more than that (10 to 20 MiB) for image processing.
Thanks,
-Martin
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
As far as I know this is architecture dependent.
Coldfire 5373 or 5329?
-Martin
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To
Sorry, a typing error. The specified length is 0x20 or 2MB. 64MB
wouldn't work very well at all! Thanks for noting the typo.
To clarify, my intent is not to boot off NAND flash but to store the image
there, have u-boot decompress it into RAM and then fire-up linux from RAM.
-Martin
I am having trouble writing to NAND flash from u-boot
- nand info
Device 0: NAND 16MiB 3.3V 8-bit, sector size 16KiB
- nand device
Device 0: NAND 16MiB 3.3V 8-bit
I then moved the uClinux image to RAM:
- tftp 0x4080 uImage
Verified that the image is there:
- md 0x4080
Attemped to
Both of these EVB's have 2MB of NOR and 16MB of NAND FLASH. It seems that
the various bootloaders are only interested in talking to NOR FLASH. Is
this the case or am I missing something. I'd like to load uClinux into NAND
FLASH where there's room to build something useful and boot from that
Why would one choose one over the other?
-Martin
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
Which of the above processors is the path to least resistance in bringing up
uClinux?
I am working on a new design and don't have lots of time to chase after
missing bits. My research seems to indicate that there's better support for
the '5272 part. True?
I suppose I could open-up the field
Sorry, that's 5373 or 5329
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Euredjian
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:25 AM
To: 'uClinux development list'
Subject: [uClinux-dev] MCF5373 or MCF5323
Which of the above processors is the path to least
