the newbie toolchain questions ;-(
--- On Tue, 11/24/09, steven taffs steventa...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: steven taffs steventa...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 12:36 PM
ok if I go
the newbie toolchain questions ;-(
Regards
Greg
--- On Tue, 11/24/09, steven taffs steventa...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: steven taffs steventa...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 12:36 PM
ok
alone outside of
a build framework like the uClinux-dist).
Regards
Greg
--- On Tue, 11/24/09, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
wrote:
From: Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Tuesday
:
From: steven taffs steventa...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 9:52 AM
Hi
thanks for the info, I will try and download the source
code from the codesourcery website so I can see which
version of gcc?
(sorry if this question is a bit basic never really played around with tool
chains before)
--- On Mon, 11/23/09, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com wrote:
From: Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev
basic never really played around with tool chains before)
--- On Mon, 11/23/09, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com wrote:
From: Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 5:36 AM
Hi
:
From: Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 5:36 AM
Hi,
ucli...@browserseal.com
wrote:
On 11/18/2009, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
wrote:
ucli
...@snapgear.com wrote:
From: Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
To: uClinux development list uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 12:49 AM
Hi Steven,
steven taffs wrote:
I guess I don't follow that logic. Why would
someone
unfamiliar
Hi,
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
On 11/18/2009, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com wrote:
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this
architecture simply is not supported
On 11/18/2009, Greg Ungerer g...@snapgear.com wrote:
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this
architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question -
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
Please note that people new to uClinux are most likely to use
Codesourcery toolchain, rather than 2007 one from uClinux web site.
Fwiw, on the ARM linux lists, Codesourcery is usually the recommended
toolchain, not the 2007 uClinux toolchain or any of the many
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this
architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question -
what happened to ARM support and uClinux in general ? Last time I
checked, i.e. about two
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this
architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question -
what happened to ARM support and uClinux in general ?
On 11/17/2009, Jeff Bacon jbac.uc@gmail.com wrote:
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this
architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question -
CodeSourcery-lite for uClinux is a good choice,
Cheers, phil
--
-Original Message-
From: ucli...@browserseal.com
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:54:00
To: uClinux development listuclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
On 11/17/2009, Jeff Bacon jbac.uc
: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:54:00
To: uClinux development listuclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
On 11/17/2009, Jeff Bacon jbac.uc@gmail.com wrote:
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors
On 11/17/2009, Jeff Bacon jbac.uc@gmail.com wrote:
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
On 11/17/2009, Jeff Bacon jbac.uc@gmail.com wrote:
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to
The 2009-q3 version that someone else mentioned ...
--
-Original Message-
From: ucli...@browserseal.com
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:12:09
To: uClinux development listuclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
On 11/17/2009, phil...@googlemail.com phil
: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:12:09
To: uClinux development listuclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support
On 11/17/2009, phil...@googlemail.com phil...@googlemail.com wrote:
CodeSourcery-lite for uClinux is a good choice,
Maybe, except that it does not work :) What is the exact version
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the
multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this
architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question -
what happened to ARM support and uClinux in general ? Last
20 matches
Mail list logo
