[uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-12 Thread Philip Nye
I am trying to build a system for Coldfire with an up-to-date kernel, tools and library. I have the latest uClinux dist (patched to 20090810) and Codesourcery tools 4.3-209. This refused to build with an error of limits.h not found. Rather than a symlink hack, this led me to try a recent release

Re: [uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 12 October 2009 06:53:45 Philip Nye wrote: > Rather than a symlink hack, this led me to try a recent release of uClibc > as the one in the uClinux dist is not so new (and I found this: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00273.html), but I now get failures > down the line because uCli

Re: [uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-12 Thread Philip Nye
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 12 October 2009 06:53:45 Philip Nye wrote: Rather than a symlink hack, this led me to try a recent release of uClibc as the one in the uClinux dist is not so new (and I found this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00273.html), but I now get failures down the

Re: [uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 12 October 2009 10:05:26 Philip Nye wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 12 October 2009 06:53:45 Philip Nye wrote: > >> Rather than a symlink hack, this led me to try a recent release of > >> uClibc as the one in the uClinux dist is not so new (and I found this: > >> http://gcc.g

Re: [uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Philip Nye wrote: > I am trying to build a system for Coldfire with an up-to-date kernel, tools > and library. I have the latest uClinux dist (patched to 20090810) and > Codesourcery tools 4.3-209. This refused to build with an error of limits.h > not found

Re: [uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-14 Thread Philip Nye
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Philip Nye wrote: ... ... but I now get failures down the line because uClibc headers contain lots of libc_hidden_proto() declarations. As I understand it, these headers should be sanitized to remove this internal code for public

Re: [uClinux-dev] building uClibc

2009-10-14 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:32:02PM +0100, Philip Nye wrote: > Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> I am currently using a coldfire (5270/5271) with gcc 4.3.3, binutils >> 2.19.1, elf2flt (blackfin version from a late april checkout, other >> versions didn't work with gcc 4.3 at the time), 2.6.30 kernel, and