Jivin Jamie Lokier lays it down ...
> Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > >Is there a (good :) ) reason why uClinux-dist/Makefile clean: target now
> > >deletes the $(LINUX)/include/asm symlink?
> > >
> > >This means that after a make clean you have to make oldconfig to get the
> > >symlink back. Perhaps t
Greg Ungerer wrote:
> >Is there a (good :) ) reason why uClinux-dist/Makefile clean: target now
> >deletes the $(LINUX)/include/asm symlink?
> >
> >This means that after a make clean you have to make oldconfig to get the
> >symlink back. Perhaps this should be in distclean rather than clean?
>
Hi John,
John Williams wrote:
Is there a (good :) ) reason why uClinux-dist/Makefile clean: target now
deletes the $(LINUX)/include/asm symlink?
This means that after a make clean you have to make oldconfig to get the
symlink back. Perhaps this should be in distclean rather than clean?
It
Hi Gerg,
Is there a (good :) ) reason why uClinux-dist/Makefile clean: target now
deletes the $(LINUX)/include/asm symlink?
This means that after a make clean you have to make oldconfig to get the
symlink back. Perhaps this should be in distclean rather than clean?
Cheers,
John
Greg Ung
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Büttner wrote:
is there any reason why the mtd-utils are not updated?
Probably nobody had a problem with them so far.
I think they don't really work with the actual jffs2 driver.
Expecially the -j switch in eraseall is missing.
Merging in the mtd-utils-1.0.0.tar.gz package i
Hi,
is there any reason why the mtd-utils are not updated?
I think they don't really work with the actual jffs2 driver.
Expecially the -j switch in eraseall is missing.
Merging in the mtd-utils-1.0.0.tar.gz package is difficult,
because the Makefile is very different.
Is there any hint what to
Hi Gavin
On 2/5/07, Gavin Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoth Greg Ungerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hmmm, well, that is interresting :-)
> Certainly appears to be a different server, but that is all I know at
> the momemt.
Seems faster. I just downloading the .bz2 image in just over an hour -
Quoth Greg Ungerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hmmm, well, that is interresting :-)
> Certainly appears to be a different server, but that is all I know at
> the momemt.
Seems faster. I just downloading the .bz2 image in just over an hour --
instead of about a day and a half, which is what the old serv
Hi Gavin,
Gavin Lambert wrote:
Quoth Greg Ungerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have generated a uClinux-dist-20070130 release. You can get it from
the usual place:
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.gz
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.bz
Quoth Greg Ungerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I have generated a uClinux-dist-20070130 release. You can get it from
> the usual place:
> http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.gz
> http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.bz2
The link to the .bz2 arch
Hi Alvin,
Alvin Cao wrote:
Hi Greg,
Would you please post the md5 checksum here?
As follows:
72926ff263c0499abd9004f631a2bb82 uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.bz2
a867164cf62020ee22906dced02e0165 uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.gz
Regards
Greg
On 2/2/07, Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H
Hi Greg,
Would you please post the md5 checksum here?
On 2/2/07, Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have generated a uClinux-dist-20070130 release. You can get it
from the usual place:
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/dist/uClinux-dist-20070130.tar.gz
http://www.uclinux.org/p
12 matches
Mail list logo
