On 08/06/12 10:05, Steven King wrote:
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 8:57:34 pm Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 07/06/12 07:02, Steven King wrote:
use MCF_IRQ_PIT1 instead of MCFINT_VECBASE + MCFINT_PIT1 so we can
support those parts that have the pit1 interrupt on other than the first
interrupt controller.
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 8:57:34 pm Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 07/06/12 07:02, Steven King wrote:
> > use MCF_IRQ_PIT1 instead of MCFINT_VECBASE + MCFINT_PIT1 so we can
> > support those parts that have the pit1 interrupt on other than the first
> > interrupt controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steve
On 07/06/12 07:02, Steven King wrote:
use MCF_IRQ_PIT1 instead of MCFINT_VECBASE + MCFINT_PIT1 so we can support
those parts that have the pit1 interrupt on other than the first interrupt
controller.
Signed-off-by: Steven King
Looks good. Applied to for-next branch of m68knommu git tree.
Than
