UdmSearch: [Fwd: patch for unitialized inscript variable in indexer.c]

1999-12-06 Thread Alexander Barkov
Hello! There was a stupid bug that indexer does not process words between body.../body. This happens not on all Unix platforms though. For example, indexer works fine on my FreeBSD box :-) Explanation and patch are below Regards Original Message Subject: patch for

Re: UdmSearch: Indexer not indexing part #2

1999-12-06 Thread Alexander Barkov
Hi! It is not implemented yet. But I think we'll add this feature in next version. Charlie Hornberger wrote: -u flag does not mean "Add this URL in the database". It means that indexer will work with those URLs that are already in database and do match SQL LIKE wildcards given in

Additional features for theerd party; was: Re: UdmSearch: typo in indexer.c (udm v2.

1999-12-06 Thread Martin Ebert
Hi all, (and sorry for my bad english; please ask, if you can't understand me!) I've been hacking on udmsearch to make it do something I need, in case someone else is already working on it. Here is a short description. This is a good idea. But only, if Alex will include the new code! . I

UdmSearch: bug in parseurl and proposed patch

1999-12-06 Thread Tin Le
I found another bug. It has to do with parseurl(). What happened is that if there is an error, parseurl() will call freeurl(url) then return(1). However, two places in indexer.c will then call freeurl(url) again after getting a 1 return from parseurl(). According to man page, free() of a

Re: Additional features for theerd party; was: Re: UdmSearch: typo inindexer.c (udm v2.

1999-12-06 Thread Tin Le
I like your proposal. I think it will be good for long term. The changes I am making is for my need, right now. I can't wait. However, I would be glad to contribute in the long term enhancements. Tin Le On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Martin Ebert wrote: Hi all, (and sorry for my bad english;