Is it advisable or possible to maintain different tables (url) for
indexing sites associated with different subject areas? I could create
different databases for each subject types, but that seems very redundant
in terms of having to have copies dictionaries, stop words etc in each
database. T
Eric Mings wrote:
>
> Is it advisable or possible to maintain different tables (url) for
> indexing sites associated with different subject areas? I could create
> different databases for each subject types, but that seems very redundant
> in terms of having to have copies dictionaries, stop word
> Hi!
>You can use URL limitation to search in database part
>as well as tag limitation. Just give different tag values for
>URLs with different subjects. Check documentation for
>further information about tag usage.
Thanks!
I think I understand this, but doesn't this just end up storing
eve
I continue to wonder whether udmsearch can be modified to allow for
multiple url tables to store information based upon a user criteria (such
as storing different subsets of sites indexed) in a table of their
choice. I understand the current ability to store tags in the single url
table that
Hi!
Eric Mings wrote:
>
> stored and searched). However the multiple database approach would result
> in considerable duplication of information (such as dictionaries,
> stopwords, etc).
stopwords and ispell dictionaries are not so large.
> It would seem that modifying the search pages to al
>I write it on our "feature requests list". But you should understand
>lacks of such method. You will not be able to search though all of
>the database parts in one SQL query (at least in databases without
>UNION).
>You see, it requires major modification of both indexing and searching
>programs.
