RE: [Ugnet] The concept of Federo: A case study - Monitor -October17-23, 2004

2004-11-04 Thread jonah kasangwawo
Okello, I was only trying to put right the misinformation that the author was spreading around about our history, and this involved our King. I do not know exactly what you want from me. Do you expect me to give up my identity in order to save myself ? Isn't that a contradiction in terms ?

Re: [Ugnet] The concept of Federo: A case study - Monitor-October17-23, 2004

2004-11-04 Thread jonah kasangwawo
Why don't you ask your friend in Lusaka ? Since he grabbed it and moved it to Uganda Land Commission, it has never been returned. What then is your 2004 view of land ? Is it the same as the NRM Land Act of 1998 ? From: Edward Mulindwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

RE: [Ugnet] The concept of Federo: A case study - Monitor - October17-23, 2004

2004-10-31 Thread jonah kasangwawo
In The concept of Federo : A case study Kajabago-ka-Rusoke talks about everything else - colonisation, land, et cetera - except about federo. Even then, his understanding of mailo land and its origin leaves a lot to be desired. He thinks that the Kabaka and his chiefs didn't own land until some

Re: [Ugnet] The concept of Federo: A case study - Monitor -October17-23, 2004

2004-10-31 Thread Edward Mulindwa
Kasangwawo Even if you are right about the land, but this is 2004 and not 1300. So a whole lot of things in Uganda have changed, the only problem is that Buganda kingdom still think it is leaving in 1300. And that is what many Ugandans are trying to explain very hard to Mengo. Secondly can you

Re: [Ugnet] The concept of Federo: A case study - Monitor -October17-23, 2004

2004-10-31 Thread Edward Mulindwa
I would not have put it any better, thank God there are the Okello's who can put what many of us think on a screen in writing. It is a public knowledge that we as Baganda must transform our kingdom from the 1300 era to the 2004 era, many kingdoms have done that and have survived, many have