[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-64?page=all ]
Thilo Goetz reassigned UIMA-64:
---
Assignee: Thilo Goetz
Remove the package org.apache.uima.tttypesystem
---
Key: UIMA-64
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-64?page=all ]
Work on UIMA-64 started by Thilo Goetz.
Remove the package org.apache.uima.tttypesystem
---
Key: UIMA-64
URL:
All,
if we want to cut a release early next year, we need to get all our
ducks in a row. My impression from following incubator-general is that
getting the release right is a *lot* of work. It is common practice in
Apache projects to have a release manager that takes care of getting the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-50?page=comments#action_12452536 ]
Tong Fin commented on UIMA-50:
--
I believe that having both versions (Framework and DTD/Schema) is useful for
the following reason:
1) Tools will use Framework version
I don't feel strongly but have a slight preference for this kind of info
to be communicated via email.
This is for 2 reasons:
1) it needs to be read in a timely way - and email is more timely
than wiki reading. (although people might
subscribe to wiki changes)
2) it doesn't need to
Thilo Goetz wrote:
You're welcome to this job :-) from my point of view.
-Marshall
All,
if we want to cut a release early next year, we need to get all our
ducks in a row. My impression from following incubator-general is
that getting the release right is a *lot* of work. It is common
