Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox

When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox

Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want

Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating

Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the CasEditor-2.2.2 test plan http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplancaseditor222.html - All issues for release 2.2.2CE are fixed The release artifacts are available on

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-01 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating

Forgot to mention: if we do want to distribute the junit code, we need similar verbiage as for eclipse, and the CPL in the LICENSE file. --Thilo Thilo Goetz wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the Cas Editor is now finally ready for release. - I finished the testing according to the

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox

Thilo Goetz wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded. This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new

[jira] Created: (UIMA-1082) Improve JCas docs to recommend against depending on == JCas cover objects

Improve JCas docs to recommend against depending on == JCas cover objects - Key: UIMA-1082 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1082 Project: UIMA Issue

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox

My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks, then

[jira] Created: (UIMA-1083) add Getting Started Guide: Working with PEARs

add Getting Started Guide: Working with PEARs - Key: UIMA-1083 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1083 Project: UIMA Issue Type: New Feature Components: Website

Re: Tika UIMA integration

How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Jörn On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, I think it would be very interesting for our users to be able to use documents in various formarts as input for UIMA. Should we start a sandbox project to write a tika

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

Using the rc08 source package on a fresh [Linux] machine, the extended tests ran with no problem. (We need to add the eclipse run configuration for this test in the source :) There was a build problem with maven resolving 2 artifacts: Path to dependency: 1)

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

Eddie Epstein wrote: Using the rc08 source package on a fresh [Linux] machine, the extended tests ran with no problem. (We need to add the eclipse run configuration for this test in the source :) There was a build problem with maven resolving 2 artifacts: Path to dependency: 1)

[jira] Created: (UIMA-1084) Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid

Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid -- Key: UIMA-1084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1084 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: Async Scaleout Reporter: Jerry Cwiklik

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

Did you (1) first download the uima-2.2.2 (base) src distr and run mvn install on uimaj? Um, nope :) Thanks, Eddie

Re: Tika UIMA integration

Jörn Kottmann wrote: How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Either something cute referring to Tika, or something that's explainitory, like textExtractionFromArtifacts or ?? Jörn On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, I think it would be very

Re: Tika UIMA integration

Tika means in good in one of Hindi languages. People from India say Tika-Tika when they mean very well. So, how about Tika-Tika? Very well :) Ahmed On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jörn Kottmann wrote: How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Either

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

Well, the problem was nothing to do with base UIMA, rather it was due to me running mvn package instead of mvn install. Not sure if this is an issue or not, but certainly not a blocking issue for release. Eddie On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Eddie Epstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you

[jira] Updated: (UIMA-1084) Uima AS JMX statistics are invalid

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-1084: Attachment: uimaj-as-jms-UIMA-1084-patch.txt uimaj-as-core-UIMA-1084-patch.txt

Re: Tika UIMA integration

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How should we call it ? Any ideas ? Tikannotator?