Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release uima-as-2.2.2-incubating release candidate 08

Marshall Schor wrote: Result: +1 Marshall Schor +1 Joern Kottmann +1 Adam Lally +1 Thilo Goetz +1 Michael Baessler +1 Edward Epstein No 0 or -1 votes received; the vote was held open > 72 hours. The vote passes. I will ask for IPMC review and approval. I just noticed that the 5D00

[VOTE] [RESULT] Release uima-as-2.2.2-incubating release candidate 08

Result: +1 Marshall Schor +1 Joern Kottmann +1 Adam Lally +1 Thilo Goetz +1 Michael Baessler +1 Edward Epstein No 0 or -1 votes received; the vote was held open > 72 hours. The vote passes. I will ask for IPMC review and approval. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: We have finished

Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-02 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating

Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the changes Thilo suggest are now included, UIMA-1093 and UIMA-1094. The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/02 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-02 is ready and can be

Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-02 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating

Jörn Kottmann wrote: Hello, the changes Thilo suggest are now included, UIMA-1093 and UIMA-1094. The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/02 So please cast your vote: [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-02 is ready and can be

Re: JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED documentation question

Michael Baessler wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: Michael Baessler wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: The documentation for this says: "The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the actual number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java), per JCas

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02

Marshall Schor wrote: > Michael Baessler wrote: >> I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release >> uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating. >> >> The release artifacts are available on >> >> people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02 >> >> >> For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar an

Re: JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED documentation question

Marshall Schor wrote: > Michael Baessler wrote: >> Marshall Schor wrote: >> >>> The documentation for this says: >>> >>> "The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the actual >>> number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java), >>> per JCas object, plus the

Re: JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED documentation question

Michael Baessler wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: The documentation for this says: "The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the actual number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java), per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual JCas co

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.2.2-fp1-incubating release candidate 02

Michael Baessler wrote: I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating. The release artifacts are available on people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02 For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip (uima-2.2

documentation for default value of PROCESS_TRACE_ENABLED

Could someone who understands this specify how the default is set (update the documentation)? A quick look at the code seem to default it to true in some cases, and in other cases, to the value set by the resource org.apache.uima.impl.performanceTuning.properties (which as shipped, sets it to

Re: JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED documentation question

Marshall Schor wrote: > The documentation for this says: > > "The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the actual > number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java), > per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual JCas > cover instances long

JCAS_CACHE_ENABLED documentation question

The documentation for this says: "The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the actual number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java), per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual JCas cover instances longer than needed. This latter i

Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-02 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating

Hi Jörn, Downloaded rc2, setup a project and browsed some xmi files and edited some annotations. Didn't get stuck anywhere :) +1 Eddie On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > the changes Thilo suggest are now included, UIMA-1093 and UIMA-1094. >

Re: [VOTE] Release CasEditor-2.2.2-02 as CasEditor-2.2.2-incubating

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello, > > the changes Thilo suggest are now included, UIMA-1093 and UIMA-1094. > > The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at > /home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/02 > > So please cast your vote: > [ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-02 is r