The summary of this vote is:
+1: Marshall, Eddie, Adam
+0: Michael, Jörn, Thilo
The vote has been open way more than 72 hours.
The vote passes.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into
> the sandbox.
>
> There was a discussion
Thanks for the update, that are good news!
-- Michael
Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
> Just to followup on the comment about ConceptMapper: I am in the process
> of putting together documentation right now, and hope to have that done
> by the end of this week. There is also a code change that was requ
Just to followup on the comment about ConceptMapper: I am in the
process of putting together documentation right now, and hope to have
that done by the end of this week. There is also a code change that
was requested by someone that I want to make, and then I will do
whatever I need to do t
+0 because I doubt that there are many users who need a tool like
this, but there is no reason to block it.
Jörn
On Dec 16, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
Sorry I'm late... thanks for the reminder.
Here is a +0 from my side.
Let me explain why I'm not so convinced about this submi
Sorry I'm late... thanks for the reminder.
Here is a +0 from my side.
Let me explain why I'm not so convinced about this submission into the Sandbox.
If I follow the discussion threads it seems to me very similar to the
ConceptMapper submission we
had in June 2008. There we added the coded after
e written myself over a couple of pages
>of xml. No offense.
Well, it is a matter of a personal preference, but going further, when
developing a GUI tool, generating XML files seems to be a better option then
generating Java code. Again
pache.org Date:
10/22/2008 05:36 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] accept the Configurable Feature Extractor (CFE) into the
sandbox
Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
Igor Sominsky is on vacation now, so he cannot respond, but
onfigurable Feature Extractor (CFE) into
the sandbox
Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
> Igor Sominsky is on vacation now, so he cannot respond, but I think it
> is safe to say that he will continue to sup
Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
Igor Sominsky is on vacation now, so he cannot respond, but I think it
is safe to say that he will continue to support this for the foreseeable
future. It is something that he and I use often, and he has been
continuing to enhance and support it.
On Sep 29, 2008, at
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into
> the sandbox.
>
> There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see
> http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a request
>
Igor Sominsky is on vacation now, so he cannot respond, but I think it
is safe to say that he will continue to support this for the
foreseeable future. It is something that he and I use often, and he
has been continuing to enhance and support it.
On Sep 29, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Thilo Goetz wro
Who will maintain this code once it's in the sandbox?
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into
the sandbox.
There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see
http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a reques
The discussion shows several people interested in CFE functionality.
Potential use of the CFE also came up in another thread discussing
tools for comparing CAS context to a reference (see
http://markmail.org/message/wbnp6zqdzr3dqyvm)
Based on these: +1
Eddie
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Mars
Marshall Schor wrote:
> Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into
> the sandbox.
>
> There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see
> http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a request
> for a Jira submission. The original did not have d
Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into
the sandbox.
There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see
http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a request
for a Jira submission. The original did not have documentation. The
submission has n
15 matches
Mail list logo
