On 3/24/2010 12:39 PM, bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tryed to check out LUCAS from the UIMA Sandbox svn and use the maven
> plugin to resolve the dependencies.
>
> Well I spend several hours trying to get it work, but its not as easy
> as it should be. Is there anywhere a good d
Hi,
I tryed to check out LUCAS from the UIMA Sandbox svn and use the maven
plugin to resolve the dependencies.
Well I spend several hours trying to get it work, but its not as easy as
it should be. Is there anywhere a good description how to use this
project with maven?
Another question
(like javacc), make a
> maven plugin to run it, etc.
>
That would be nice!
Thanks for your hints.
Tommaso
>
> -Marshall
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject:svn commit: r915877 - in
>
> /incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/AlchemyAPIAnnotator/src/main/java
generated artifacts (like javacc), make a
maven plugin to run it, etc.
-Marshall
Original Message
Subject:svn commit: r915877 - in
/incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/AlchemyAPIAnnotator/src/main/java/org/apache/uima/alchemy/ts:
categorization/ entity/ keywords/ language/ microfor
mented on UIMA-1716:
> --
>
> Regarding the release: I have been looking around in Maven archives, but I
> can only find the UIMA-J artifacts, no released UIMA sandbox artifacts in any
> Maven repository I know of. If they have been released, have the
ease: I have been looking around in Maven archives, but I can
only find the UIMA-J artifacts, no released UIMA sandbox artifacts in any Maven
repository I know of. If they have been released, have they also been uploaded
to a Maven repository?
Regarding m2eclipse: Yes, that is quite different
evel, besides the simpleServer.
The Eclipse SVN client I think has been updated to now warn you if you try and
check in a change to a "tag", but this is a fairly recent change. Hopefully it
will minimize these errors in the future.
>
fine
at least with Eclipse+m2eclipse as well as IntelliJ as I have heard.
> UIMA Sandbox components in tag 2.2.2 are 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> ---
>
> Key: UIMA-1716
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIM
wing only one file in the sandbox tag
was updated - the one for SimpleServer/pom.xml. And comparing the two
revisions shows only that one file as different. Please let me know if there
are others that I may have missed...
> UIMA Sandbox components in tag 2.2.2 are 2.3.0-S
un a script to do the updating for the
"next" release which is supposed to run against the trunk, not against the tag.
I don't know what happened, but I agree this change should be reverted. If
there are no objections, I'll do that in a day or 2.
> UIMA Sandbox compon
UIMA Sandbox components in tag 2.2.2 are 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
---
Key: UIMA-1716
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1716
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sandbox
I am starting to update the release notes and build 07 candidates for
base uima and uima-as, based on the fixes now closed in Jira.
-Marshall
; New Revision: 807253
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807253&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [UIMA-1501]
>>
>> Added:
>> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/Lucas/DISCLAIMER
>> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/Lucas/doc/
>>
Why did you check in the user guide as PDF ?
Jörn
sc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: schor
Date: Mon Aug 24 14:53:26 2009
New Revision: 807253
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807253&view=rev
Log:
[UIMA-1501]
Added:
incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/Lucas/DISCLAIMER
incubator/
e.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> Author: tommaso
> >>> Date: Thu Sep 3 10:16:17 2009
> >>> New Revision: 810863
> >>>
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=810863&view=rev
> >>> Log:
> >>> [UI
>>> Author: tommaso
>>> Date: Thu Sep 3 10:16:17 2009
>>> New Revision: 810863
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=810863&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> [UIMA-1462] SimpleUimaAsService has checked in SimpleServer libraries
on purpose?
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> tomm...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: tommaso
>>>> Date: Thu Sep 3 10:16:17 2009
>>>> New Revision: 810863
>>>>
>>>&g
;> New Revision: 810863
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=810863&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> [UIMA-1462] SimpleUimaAsService has checked in SimpleServer libraries as
>> binaries
>>> Added:
>>> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/SimpleServe
he.org/viewvc?rev=810863&view=rev
> > Log:
> > [UIMA-1462] SimpleUimaAsService has checked in SimpleServer libraries as
> binaries
> >
> > Added:
> > incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/SimpleServer/src/main/assembly/
> >
> incubator/uima/sandbox/t
7 2009
> New Revision: 810863
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=810863&view=rev
> Log:
> [UIMA-1462] SimpleUimaAsService has checked in SimpleServer libraries as
> binaries
>
> Added:
> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/SimpleServer/src/main/assembly/
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> sc...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: schor
>> Date: Mon Aug 24 15:07:55 2009
>> New Revision: 807273
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807273&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [UIMA-1501]
>>
>> Modified:
&
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> sc...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: schor
>> Date: Mon Aug 24 15:13:52 2009
>> New Revision: 807280
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807280&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [UIMA-1501]
>>
>> Modified:
sc...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: schor
> Date: Mon Aug 24 15:07:55 2009
> New Revision: 807273
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807273&view=rev
> Log:
> [UIMA-1501]
>
> Modified:
> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/Tagger/pom.xml
>
> Modif
sc...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: schor
> Date: Mon Aug 24 15:13:52 2009
> New Revision: 807280
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807280&view=rev
> Log:
> [UIMA-1501]
>
> Modified:
> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/WhitespaceTokenizer/pom.xml
>
>
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> sc...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: schor
>> Date: Mon Aug 24 14:49:29 2009
>> New Revision: 807252
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807252&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [UIMA-1501]
>>
>> Modified:
>&g
sc...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: schor
> Date: Mon Aug 24 14:49:29 2009
> New Revision: 807252
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=807252&view=rev
> Log:
> [UIMA-1501]
>
> Modified:
> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/FsVariables/pom.xml
>
>
Marshall Schor wrote:
> I can see Michael's point to have sandbox things depend on released
> components, but only for those sandbox things not being released.
>
> When we get to release time, for the ones being released, the released
> components (if it follows all of our other conventions, and m
28 19:29:29 2009
>>> New Revision: 798672
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=798672&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> [UIMA-1461] update dependencies to depend on 2.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
>>> version
>>>
>>> Modi
.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
>> version
>>
>> Modified:
>> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/WhitespaceTokenizer/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/WhitespaceTokenizer/pom.xml
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/
sc...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: schor
> Date: Tue Jul 28 19:29:29 2009
> New Revision: 798672
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=798672&view=rev
> Log:
> [UIMA-1461] update dependencies to depend on 2.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT version
>
> Modified:
>
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Sorry, did the reformat thing again. I only changed the static
>> paths to use System.getProperty("file.separator") instead of a
>> hard coded /. Sorry about that.
>>
> Why don't you use File.separatorChar ?
Because I didn't know it existed ;-) I
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Sorry, did the reformat thing again. I only changed the static
paths to use System.getProperty("file.separator") instead of a
hard coded /. Sorry about that.
Why don't you use File.separatorChar ?
Jörn
8115
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=798115&view=rev
> Log:
> UIMA-1403: two test cases broken on windows.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1403
>
> Modified:
>
> incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/Lucas/src/test/java/org/apache/uima/lucas/consumer/Luce
of ConceptMapper on UIMA sandbox components web page
>
>
> Key: UIMA-1372
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1372
> Project: UIMA
> Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Schor reassigned UIMA-1372:
Assignee: Marshall Schor
> Improve description of ConceptMapper on UIMA sandbox compone
Improve description of ConceptMapper on UIMA sandbox components web page
Key: UIMA-1372
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1372
Project: UIMA
Issue Type
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Author: eae
>> Date: Wed Oct 22 09:22:10 2008
>> New Revision: 707120
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=707120&view=rev
>> Log: (empty)
>>
>> Modified:
>>
>>
>> incubator/uima/sandbox/t
a command line way to do this, too...
--Thilo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: eae
Date: Wed Oct 22 09:22:10 2008
New Revision: 707120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=707120&view=rev
Log: (empty)
Modified:
incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/uima-as/uimaj-as-jms/src/main/resources/jms_adapter_me
A-1102]
Added:
incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/CasViewerEclipsePlugin/
I don't recall voting on this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: schor
Date: Wed Jul 2 07:34:14 2008
New Revision: 673404
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=673404&view=rev
Log:
[UIMA-1102]
Added:
incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/CasViewerEclipsePlugin/
Sounds good to me... especially the suggestion with the component
versions that does not change if there is no change!
The other thing I would like to mention again is that from my
perspective the Sandbox is a place for playing around with new ideas and
technologies. But if one of the Sandbox
Re: releasing the Cas Editor - with or without some pre-packaged annotators.
I suspect that Joern would be willing to be the "release manager" for
this :-). He may even be willing to bundle some of the more "stable"
sandbox components with it, but certainly not uima-as (uima-ee), which
is not
e analysis engine.
Using a scripting language can be very handy to do quick
prototyping, pre/post processing, CAS cleaning tasks or
typeystem conversion/adaptation.
The Java source of the annotator can be accessed from the SVN
repository at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/sandb
Fine with me!
Olivier
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Thilo Goetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 23 novembre 2007 17:09
> À : uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [jira] Closed: (UIMA-624) UIMA Sandbox BSF
> Annotator initial code drop
>
handy to do quick prototyping, pre/post
processing, CAS
cleaning tasks or typeystem conversion/adaptation.
The Java source of the annotator can be accessed from the SVN repository at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/BSFAnnotator.
Olivier Terrier wrote:
> Hi Michael
lysis engine.
Using a scripting language can be very handy to do quick prototyping, pre/post
processing, CAS cleaning tasks or typeystem conversion/adaptation.
The Java source of the annotator can be accessed in the SVN repository at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/sandbox/trunk/BSFAnno
. Thanks!
UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code drop
Key: UIMA-624
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Sandbox
t would be my suggestion. Olivier, what do you think?
>
> I've checked the other 3rd party components, they seem to be in order.
>
>
>
>> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code drop
>>
>>
>>
LICENSE file to
Apache conventions. Thanks!
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code drop
>
>
> Key: UIMA-624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624
> Project: UIMA
>
Rhino (javascript) instead
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code drop
>
>
> Key: UIMA-624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624
> Project: UIMA
> Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler updated UIMA-605:
--
Component/s: (was: Sandbox)
Sandbox-Tagger
> UIMA Sandbox tagger init
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler updated UIMA-624:
--
Component/s: (was: Sandbox)
Sandbox-BSFAnnotator
> UIMA Sandbox
nk?
>
> Olivier
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : Thilo Goetz (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Envoyé : mercredi 21 novembre 2007 13:17
>> À : Olivier Terrier
>> Objet : [jira] Commented: (UIMA-624) UIMA Sandbox BSF
>> Annotator init
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 21 novembre 2007 13:17
> À : Olivier Terrier
> Objet : [jira] Commented: (UIMA-624) UIMA Sandbox BSF
> Annotator initial code drop
>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.atlass
> ian.jira.plugin.system.i
r SVN, nor do we
want to distribute it.
So what are our options? Leave it out and tell people where to get it and how
to install it would be my suggestion. Olivier, what do you think?
I've checked the other 3rd party components, they seem to be in order.
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12544406
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-624:
--
See uima-dev, message-ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for further discussion.
scal Coupet
>>> Chief Technology Officer & Co-founder
>>>
>>> TEMIS INC
>>> 1518 Walnut Street, suite 1702, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
>>> www.temis.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
Hmmm, that seems very strange... Do you have any hints as to why it
only works with a high resolution screen? I'm surprised that anything
in the build is dependent on the screen resolution.
-Marshall
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>> This is how we do
>> the UIMA docbook (so there's code there that can
This is how we do
the UIMA docbook (so there's code there that can be reused for this),
and it keeps our SVN cleaner, I think.
The docbook code for this has the issue, that it only works
with a high screen resulution. The first time I build
the docbooks on my macbook I had to attach an external
>
>> Pascal
>>
>>
>> Pascal Coupet
>> Chief Technology Officer & Co-founder
>>
>> TEMIS INC
>> 1518 Walnut Street, suite 1702, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
>> www.temis.com
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>>
OTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 5:43 AM
> To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-624) UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial
> code drop
>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.atlassian
m: Thilo Goetz (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 5:43 AM
To: uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-624) UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial
code drop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.at
se comment either way,
so we can make some progress here. Thanks.
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code drop
>
>
> Key: UIMA-624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624
> Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Terrier updated UIMA-624:
-
Attachment: jruby-COPYING.CPL
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code d
to change the jruby.COPYING.LGPL by the jruby.COPYING.CPL
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Olivier
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : Thilo Goetz (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 11:47
>> À : uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
y the jruby.COPYING.CPL
What do you think ?
Olivier
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Thilo Goetz (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2007 11:47
> À : uima-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Objet : [jira] Commented: (UIMA-624) UIMA Sandbox BSF
> Annotator initial code
se basis.
What we can do is document for users where they can acquire the GPLed software,
and what they need to do to integrate it with your annotator. Does that make
sense in this case?
--Thilo
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Terrier updated UIMA-624:
-
Attachment: BSFAnnotator.zip
> UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code d
UIMA Sandbox BSF Annotator initial code drop
Key: UIMA-624
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-624
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Sandbox
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi Marshall,
as usual, my view is pretty much the exact opposite ;-)
First of all, I don't see the sense in creating yet another
category. To my mind, there's nothing wrong with having
mature components in the sandbox. The only thing I would
consid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538536
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-605:
--
Committed Viterbi.java, thanks.
> UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code d
multiplications in the
original Viterbi).
> UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code drop
> -
>
> Key: UIMA-605
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605
> Project: UIMA
> Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-605.
Resolution: Fixed
> UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code d
:
* I generated the JCas classes, they were missing from the zip file
* I modified the aggregate descriptor to correctly reference the whitespace
tokenizer
Thanks, and keep up the good work.
> UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code drop
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz reassigned UIMA-605:
Assignee: Thilo Goetz
> UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eugenie Giesbrecht updated UIMA-605:
Attachment: Tagger_jira.zip
basic framework
> UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code d
UIMA Sandbox tagger initial code drop
-
Key: UIMA-605
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-605
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Sandbox
Reporter: Eugenie
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
>
> as usual, my view is pretty much the exact opposite ;-)
>
> First of all, I don't see the sense in creating yet another
> category. To my mind, there's nothing wrong with having
> mature components in the sandbox. The only thing I would
> consider is to move
Hi Marshall,
as usual, my view is pretty much the exact opposite ;-)
First of all, I don't see the sense in creating yet another
category. To my mind, there's nothing wrong with having
mature components in the sandbox. The only thing I would
consider is to move some sandbox components that are
How do other projects do this kind of thing?
I'm thinking of the Commons project (was Jakarta Commons) - has lots of
downloadable subparts; each is separate.
I don't have a strong preference, but I would lean toward the following
kinds of things:
1) having a new category of things: Apache UIMA
On 10/15/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think now it is time to discuss how we should proceed with the Sandbox
> components and how we will release them.
> The Sandbox is a place to develop components or tooling and to play with
> new technologies around UIMA. If some o
Hi,
I think now it is time to discuss how we should proceed with the Sandbox
components and how we will release them.
The Sandbox is a place to develop components or tooling and to play with
new technologies around UIMA. If some of the components are stable and
tested they
should be included t
Baessler wrote:
OK if nobody disagree I will move the current Sandbox documentation
chapters into the sub projects and remove the build that create one
big Sandbox documentation.
-- Michael
Michael Baessler wrote:
With the current UIMA Sandbox documentation setup we create one large
; -- Michael
>
> Michael Baessler wrote:
> > With the current UIMA Sandbox documentation setup we create one large
> > documentation that contains all the sandbox components.
> > I don't like this setup. If I'm only interested in one Sandbox
> > component I hav
OK if nobody disagree I will move the current Sandbox documentation
chapters into the sub projects and remove the build that create one big
Sandbox documentation.
-- Michael
Michael Baessler wrote:
With the current UIMA Sandbox documentation setup we create one large
documentation that
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Unfortunately there is no such documentation.
Well, we do have general (but not sandbox specific) docs on how to do
this on our website, here:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.eclipse
-Marshall
n how to setup the projects in Sanbox in
my Eclipse.
If we have such a documentation, please post a link here.
Thanks,
Tong
On 9/12/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the current UIMA Sandbox documentation setup we create one large
documentation that contains all
Hi Michael,
I am looking for the documentation on how to setup the projects in Sanbox in
my Eclipse.
If we have such a documentation, please post a link here.
Thanks,
Tong
On 9/12/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> With the current UIMA Sandbox documentation setup w
With the current UIMA Sandbox documentation setup we create one large
documentation that contains all the sandbox components.
I don't like this setup. If I'm only interested in one Sandbox component
I have to build/get the complete Sandbox documentation. If I want to
package for
On 12/13/06, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the default PEAR directory layout was optional. It would be
> nice if the Maven layout were supported.
I don't think the UIMA nature is optional. Some of the directories must
exist but maybe we can change that...
I think onl
Adam Lally wrote:
Hmmm.. how hard would it be to have a pear packager that runs outside
of Eclipse? It does seem like a poor dependency to have since we
claim UIMA doesn't require Eclipse.
So in that case we can also think about creating a pear package during
the build.
I will check if it is po
On 12/13/06, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- To package a analysis component as pear file we have to use eclipse,
since we do not have a pear packager outside of eclipse. So users have
to use eclipse if they want to package an analysis component.
Hmmm.. how hard would it be to hav
Hi,
when writing the first analysis component for the UIMA sandbox I came to
the point where I have to provide a build for the component.
My first thought was to do this also with Maven but when trying to add
the pom.xml some incompatibilities came to my mind.
- To package a analysis
Marshall Schor wrote:
Can you update the wiki (and the main website too) so that users who
click on "sandbox" are directed to a page with some explanation - what
is this, how should it be used, what are the "rules" for it, etc. I'd
look at other apache projects for guidance here.
Thanks. -Ma
Can you update the wiki (and the main website too) so that users who
click on "sandbox" are directed to a page with some explanation - what
is this, how should it be used, what are the "rules" for it, etc. I'd
look at other apache projects for guidance here.
Thanks. -Marshall
On 12/6/06, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
the initial UIMA sandbox is in place.
Today I updated the UIMA website and the SVN repository to add the UIMA
sandbox for analysis components and tooling.
The website should be live shortly so you can have a look and come bac
Hi,
the initial UIMA sandbox is in place.
Today I updated the UIMA website and the SVN repository to add the UIMA
sandbox for analysis components and tooling.
The website should be live shortly so you can have a look and come back
with some comments and suggestions if you like.
I decided to
97 matches
Mail list logo
