Re: [uknof] A dual stack London2012?

2012-01-13 Thread Matthew Hattersley
I think if this was in prep for the 2016 games one might agree but it's not, and the platform servicing the Olympics was built along time ago, infact I believe alot of it was built even before London had been selected as the host city! Surely, technical limitations aside, the Olympics at

Re: [uknof] A dual stack London2012?

2012-01-13 Thread Keith Mitchell
On 01/12/2012 06:10 PM, Neil J. McRae wrote: Firewalls, load balancers and other network equipment has not and even still some of the IPV6 implementations are not upto IPV4 production status. don't get me started on consumer equipment - where V6 is a joke, Indeed :-( Funnily enough at

Re: [uknof] A dual stack London2012?

2012-01-13 Thread Thomas Mangin
On 13 Jan 2012, at 23:49, Paul M wrote: I have an interesting idea. A lot of these consumer grade CPEs haven't sufficient ROM/RAM to do dual stack. So, throw out the IPv4 stack altogether. Get rid of the nat, port mapping, all the crappy broken SIP ALGs etc, everything required to make room.

Re: [uknof] A dual stack London2012?

2012-01-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/01/13 23:49, Paul M wrote: I have an interesting idea. A lot of these consumer grade CPEs haven't sufficient ROM/RAM to do dual stack. So, throw out the IPv4 stack altogether. Get rid of the nat, port mapping, all the crappy broken SIP ALGs etc, everything required to make room.