Hi list,
This is my first post to the list so let me briefly introduce myself. I’m a
network engineer — worked with the local national and research network for 15+
years, now chairing the freshly started Slovenian NOG. Currently I'm part of a
development and design verification team for a vendo
I think you will find (1) at the top of the list (i.e simplicity taking the
ruling position) shortly followed by 4B , in many cases the provider will give
the customer a private ASN (even the same private ASN) to make network
management simpler.
Dave
> On 17 Jun 2015, at 09:33, Matjaz Straus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/Jun/15 10:32, Matjaz Straus Istenic wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This is my first post to the list so let me briefly introduce myself.
I’m a network engineer — worked with the local national and research
network for 15+ years, now chairing the freshl
On 17 June 2015 at 09:37, David Freedman wrote:
> I think you will find (1) at the top of the list (i.e simplicity taking the
> ruling position) shortly followed by 4B , in many cases the provider will
> give the customer a private ASN (even the same private ASN) to make network
> management si
+1
On 17/06/2015 09:37, David Freedman wrote:
I think you will find (1) at the top of the list (i.e simplicity taking the
ruling position) shortly followed by 4B , in many cases the provider will give
the customer a private ASN (even the same private ASN) to make network
management simpler.
also , let's not forget the folk using RFC4577 (OSPFv2) because customer wants
an OSPF network and needs the providers network to participate in the routing.
I have come across some of this stuff , and I would have given it third place,
possibly a tie with the folk using iBGP because they either
I'd say static routing for single homed deployments and BGP for dual homed.
Anything else only if there's a very specific requirement. Whilst there are
other options it doesn't mean you have to use or make all of them
available. Keep in mind that someone will have to maintain/support that
network.
Thank you for the feedback,
Cheers,
Matjaž
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Depends on your segment.
In the larger enterprises many of them run EIGRP and need you to run it, this
is (was) a pain as if your edge device wasn't Cisco you ended up having to put
a layer of Cisco 26/36 devices to do redistribution. I've seen OSPF plenty of
times also. Only one on that list I
On 18 June 2015 at 02:01, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> Depends on your segment.
>
> In the larger enterprises many of them run EIGRP and need you to run it,
> this is (was) a pain as if your edge device wasn't Cisco you ended up
> having to put a layer of Cisco 26/36 devices to do redistribution. I've
>Have examples of larger customers requiring to speak EIGRP/OSPF, in our case,
>we handle re-distribution on the CE and maintain a common design for PE-CE
>using BGP across different access media.
So I take it you've never come across (or never sold to) a customer who needs
OSPF interaction wi
On 18 June 2015 at 10:06, David Freedman
wrote:
>
> So I take it you've never come across (or never sold to) a customer
> who needs OSPF interaction with your network between sites (I.e, they want
> you to do layer 3 services, *and* participate in / bridge their backbone
> area, because they
Yes we have this scenario also but unfortunately it doesn't cover every use
case (esp on fast failover and/or mixed carrier setups).
Cheers,
Neil
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Jun 2015, at 10:01, Alistair C
mailto:uk...@imf2000.org>> wrote:
On 18 June 2015 at 02:01, Neil J. McRae
mailto:n...@dom
13 matches
Mail list logo
