Adrian,
Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with a
Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would seem there's
little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can tell LAGs are only
possible on a per-port basis (at least on Cisco
On 14/05/13 08:20, Charlie Boisseau wrote:
Adrian,
Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with
a Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would
seem there's little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can
tell LAGs are only possible
On 14/05/13 08:20, Charlie Boisseau wrote:
Adrian,
Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with
a Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would
seem there's little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can
tell LAGs are only possible
We only use FireBricks, and I have no idea on cisco boxes - don't have
any :-)
I didn't expect anything less!
Presumably you could make an LAG on two ports, and have those cabled to
ports that are each untagged on a VLAN that then routes through to the
FTTC lines at the far end. That should
As a side note to this discussion (and vaguely related to FTTC as a
replacement for EFM), I see a lot of operators are already selling FTTC
as uncontended. Can FTTC really be claimed as uncontended when
operators have zero control or monitoring of the fibre circuit from the
exchange to the
I see a lot of operators are already selling FTTC
as uncontended
I've only noticed unlimited.
Can FTTC really be claimed as uncontended when
People stopped implementing a specific cotnention long
ago and at BTs backhaul rates why would they contend you,
there's money to be made on letting
I wonder if there's a way to do it at the Ethernet level (when buying GEA
instead of via WBC/L2TP)? Openreach handoff raw FTTx circuits to us as a VLAN
on an interconnect in each exchange, and we get similar delivery on our
interconnects with BTWholesale and TalkTalk for accessing exchanges we
Pretty sure Andrews Arnold offer it on all their offerings.
http://www.aa.net.uk/
On 11 May 2013, at 15:09, Paul Mansfield
paul+uk...@mansfield.co.ukmailto:paul+uk...@mansfield.co.uk wrote:
are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
I would guess that if they can already do it
On Sat, 11 May 2013, Paul Mansfield wrote:
are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
I would guess that if they can already do it with ADSL/ADSL2+ then it
must be possible with FTTC?
I think plenty do it - AAISP, ADSL24, Goscomb etc etc
Thread from a while back:
We will offering it at a DSLAM level on all of our SLU cabinets shortly.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 May 2013, at 22:05, Paul Mansfield paul+uk...@mansfield.co.uk wrote:
are there any ISPs planning to offer FTTC circuit bonding?
I would guess that if they can already do it with ADSL/ADSL2+
10 matches
Mail list logo
