Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

Thanks for the bug report -- I'll try to fix it soon. As to the examples, there is nothing really fancy about them at all, so it must be your system or browser. The source for the table you mention is: 2.2 History RE: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE

2000-07-08 Thread John Hudson

At 03:21 PM 7/7/2000 -0800, Kenneth Whistler wrote: >P.S. Donald Figge is right about the non-fixed nature of the 'fixed width' >em (or en). Em and en measurement is adjusted by the expansion factor >of expanded (or condensed) fonts. Er, yes, if you're mechanically expanding or condensing a font

Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Katsuhiko Momoi

Hi, I need to correct myself below. The problem remains a mystery. - Kat Katsuhiko Momoi wrote: > > Doug Ewell wrote: > > > > Michael \(michka\) Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Can the authors (or reformatters) of Unicode Technical Reports please > > >> keep the use of "fancy" HTM

Unregistring....

2000-07-08 Thread Sina Ahmadian

Hi, How can I be out of this mailing list? Sina Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

RE: [idn] Preparation of Internationalized Host Names - Hebrew

2000-07-08 Thread Karen

I agree that the points should be ignored. >> > > >2. Points >> >> >05b0 to 05c4 >> >> > >> >> >These should be either prohibited or ignored since they are >> optional. >> >> >Personally, I would rather ignore them because a user may enter >> >> them and why >> >> >not let him. >> How doe

RE: Not all Arabics are created equal...

2000-07-08 Thread John Cowan

On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > As a point of fact: Arabic is not bidirectional, in spite of the > protestations of Unicode. It's more accurate and less prejudicial > technologically to call call it a Least-Significant-Digit-First language. IIRC, we determined that in fact Arabic

Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Asmus Freytag

Doug's point is well taken. It's been the editorial committee's policy to make sure that TR's can be accessed from a wide variety of browsers. If limiting the range of formatting that is to be used in TR's makes a real difference to people in the implementers community, then that is something

Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Katsuhiko Momoi

Doug Ewell wrote: > > Michael \(michka\) Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Can the authors (or reformatters) of Unicode Technical Reports please > >> keep the use of "fancy" HTML and Javascript in TR's to a minimum? > >> Tables and simple stylesheets ought to be sufficient. This is not a

Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE

2000-07-08 Thread Markus Scherer

Michael Everson wrote: > They're down the pub watching football on the telly. i would like to be at the pool on a saturday as nice as this... instead i am in the office implementing stuff for icu. markus

Holy Moly! You can have THOSE letters in host names?!

2000-07-08 Thread 11digitboy

NOBODY TOLD ME YOU COULD HAVE THOSE LETTERS IN A HOST NAME!!! So you could have .com for a lady named Michiko, or something? -- Robert Lozyniak Accusplit pedometer, purchased about 2000a07l01d19h45mZ, has NOT FLIPPED My page: http://walk.to/11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email (917) 421-3909 x1133 - voic

Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan

I think you missed my point, Doug. If you were a person who regular had to deal with such issues, as I imagine Mark has to be (heck, I am, and I am not nearly as busy as he is!), then it is likely that you have a certain level of technology... and it is also likely that you do not test everything

Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Doug Ewell

Michael \(michka\) Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can the authors (or reformatters) of Unicode Technical Reports please >> keep the use of "fancy" HTML and Javascript in TR's to a minimum? >> Tables and simple stylesheets ought to be sufficient. This is not an >> elaborate sales or marketi

SUE - Simple Unicode Editor

2000-07-08 Thread Franko Luin

On Tomasz Kukielka has posted an alpha version of SUE - Simple Unicode Editor for Mac OS 9, based on MLTE. The source code is available as well. Franko Luin

RE: [idn] Preparation of Internationalized Host Names - Arabic

2000-07-08 Thread Jonathan Rosenne

I did not mention Arabic vowels and Shadda because I don't feel qualified to. Jony > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hoffman / IMC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 8:06 PM > To: Jonathan Rosenne; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [idn] Preparation of Internationa

Re: Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan

> FYI, I am using Windows 95 (revision B), Netscape Navigator 4.06, and > printing to an HP LaserJet 4M Plus. > Can the authors (or reformatters) of Unicode Technical Reports please > keep the use of "fancy" HTML and Javascript in TR's to a minimum? > Tables and simple stylesheets ought to be s

Bug in TR 19, and fancy HTML in TR's

2000-07-08 Thread Doug Ewell

I found a problem in Technical Report 19, "UTF-32." In the Definitions section, the three terms UTF-32BE, UTF-32LE, and UTF-32 are defined. Under UTF-32, there is the following bullet point: o In UTF-32BE, <004D 0061 D800 DC00> is serialized as <00 00 FE FF 00 00 00 4D 00 00 00 61 00 0

Re: Corel Draw/Ms Office

2000-07-08 Thread Curtis Clark

At 01:43 PM 00.07.07 -0800, Magda Danish (Unicode) wrote: -Original Message- From: neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How can I convert the font to Unicode for it to work with Office? Unless Corel Draw has improved its .ttf export since version 7, you can't without switching to another fo

Re: Difference between EM QUAD and EM SPACE

2000-07-08 Thread Michael Everson

Ar 16:56 -0800 2000-07-07, scríobh Rick McGowan: >Well wait a darn minute there young man! The village elders are just >supposed to KNOW the stories and sit around all day spouting them, whether >anyone's listening or not. Other people are supposed to suddenly realize >that the irreplaceable cu

Re: FW: A question about charset

2000-07-08 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan

Most browsers support UTF-8 but many have problems with UTF-16. There is one feature in IE 5.0/5.01/5.5 that actually makes choosing a specific charset for different languages more compelling. if they jump to your your page and language support needs to be installed to see it, then it can be

RE: Any other Italians on Unicode List? (was RE: French annotated Cha

2000-07-08 Thread Jonathan Rosenne

Regarding cantillation marks, I have two Italian references: S. D. Luzzatto, Prolegomeni ad una grammatica ragionata della lingua ebraica, 1836 L. Levi, Canto sinagogale e canto cristiano, 1956. I hope this helps. Jony > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT