RE: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?

2001-02-02 Thread Marco Cimarosti
Can anyone comment about whether and how Unicode is supported in DB2 (Universal Database)? Thanks. Marco

[ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?

2001-02-02 Thread Elaine Keown
Hello, What version of ISO 10646-x is the same as Unicode 3.0? Are there ISO updates each time that correspond to the Unicode 3.0.1 and so forth? Also, are the Hebrew sections in the corresponding ISO version the same as in Unicode, e.g., is there a main Hebrew block and then an

Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?

2001-02-02 Thread John Cowan
Elaine Keown wrote: What version of ISO 10646-x is the same as Unicode 3.0? ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000. Are there ISO updates each time that correspond to the Unicode 3.0.1 and so forth? No. Typically the properties that are affected by changes to the third component of the version

Unicode 3.1 update?

2001-02-02 Thread jarkko . hietaniemi
http://www.unicode.org/Public/3.1-Update/ is still carrying the beta files.

list of the characters that aren't supported by XML/WML

2001-02-02 Thread Magda Danish (Unicode)
-Original Message-From: Bruce Maginnis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:25 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Do you know where I could get a list of the characters that aren't supported by XML/WML, i.e the ones that need to be inserted in actual Unicode

RE: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?

2001-02-02 Thread Jonathan Rosenne
I think ISO does not specify the bidi algorithm. Jony -Original Message- From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:21 PM To: Unicode List Cc: Unicode List Subject: Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ? Elaine Keown wrote:

RE: list of the characters that aren't supported by XML/WML

2001-02-02 Thread Mike Brown
Bruce Maginnis wrote: Do you know where I could get a list of the characters that aren't supported by XML/WML, i.e the ones that need to be inserted in actual Unicode values?? The characters that are not allowed in XML documents are not allowed at *all*, not even via character references

Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?

2001-02-02 Thread Peter_Constable
On 02/02/2001 09:29:08 AM Elaine Keown wrote: What version of ISO 10646-x is the same as Unicode 3.0? Are there ISO updates each time that correspond to the Unicode 3.0.1 and so forth? I'll add to the answers John Cowan gave (all of which are correct). Unicode and ISO are synchronised,

Re: Unicode 3.1 update?

2001-02-02 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Jarkko stated: http://www.unicode.org/Public/3.1-Update/ is still carrying the beta files. That is because we are still in the beta period. Not all data files are final yet, and not all files for the Unicode Character Database for Version 3.1 have been completed and posted yet. The UTC met

RE: Unicode 3.1 update?

2001-02-02 Thread jarkko . hietaniemi
Thanks for the information and sorry for being so impatient :-) -Original Message- From: ext Kenneth Whistler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 1:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Unicode 3.1 update?

RE: Creating an Input Method

2001-02-02 Thread Russ Rolfe
Nikita There is some online information about Input Method Editors (IME) at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?URL=/library/books/devintl /s24b6_d.htm In your E-mail you stated that you are using the Windows Platform. If you are using Windows 2000, it already comes with IMEs for

Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?

2001-02-02 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Peter and John provided an answer to Elaine Keown's question: On 02/02/2001 09:29:08 AM Elaine Keown wrote: What version of ISO 10646-x is the same as Unicode 3.0? Are there ISO updates each time that correspond to the Unicode 3.0.1 and so forth? I'll add to the answers John Cowan