Font problem with Japanese period

A few hours ago, Frank Tang gave us a link. It led us to a page about a display bug in Netscape. This bug causes the Japanese period to sometimes display incorrectly. 1) Momoi-san, just between you and me, I've seen better-looking kana on my Game Boy. 2) Your problem with the ugly kana is not u

Re: Fact vs. fiction

Doug Ewell wrote, > If you visit the official Web site for the "Lord of the Rings" > movie at and click on "Tengwar Links," you > will discover the following links: > > > Unicode Standard: Cirth ConScript > > Unicode specifications of the Cirith [sic] scr

Ruby (was: Re: Vertical scripts)

At 17:30 01/12/25 -0800, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote: >From: "$BAk]namdqor(B $BDialamt_dgr"(B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > By the way, does any browser in common use > > support the Ruby extensions to HTML? The 'ruby extensions for HTML' are defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/, a W3C recommen

Fact vs. fiction

You know you're spending too much time thinking about Unicode when you hear about the new "Lord of the Rings" movie and your first thought is about Tengwar and Cirth, the scripts invented by Tolkien and encoded in the ConScript Unicode Registry

Re: Euro in Email headers, misinformation?

On this system, responding to the letter generates: > From: "Richard ÄŒepas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Kaplan's response arrived as: >> From: "Richard ÄOepas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In the 'folder e-mail list window', the name appears as 'Richard Cepas'. Perhaps the correct name is "Richard

Re: Rush request for help!

Suzanne M. Topping wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Hello all,I'm rushing to send off the final draft of a Unicode paper for theupcoming conference, and am desperate to find a legitimate example ofHan Unification display problems. The following exmaple may not be consider a "Han" one. But it is

Re: Euro in Email headers, misinformation?

On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote: > But lets not make the situation worse than it actually is -- MS bashing is > much more effective when its accurate, don't you think? :-) And there is MS basher bashing (TM), which is a rare art practiced by Michael ;-) BTW, I wish to restat

Re: Euro in Email headers, misinformation?

From: "Roozbeh Pournader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > And there is MS basher bashing (TM), which is a rare art practiced by > Michael ;-) Hey, I often get into trouble for actually bashing myself (i.e. biting the hand that feeds me since I do contract

Re: Euro in Email headers, misinformation?

From: "Richard ÄOepas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Plain 8bit headers are not default Outlook/Outlook setting > for mail. But people tend to use it as Outlook/OE allows > this (unfortunately) without knowing consequences. Piece of MS Misinformation (tm) #1: Outlook Express usually happens to work, *ex

Re: Euro in Email headers, misinformation?

On Wed Dec 26 00:17:53 2001 +0330 Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > >On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, Dr. International wrote: > >> In fact, I didn't know about RFC 2047. Unfortunately my contacts in the >> Exchange team did not mention that this might be the reason for the lost >> Euro in the subject line. A quick