Re: Font problem with Japanese period

2001-12-27 Thread Yung-Fong Tang
All the problem you memtioned below is caused by on display problem which have been fixed a while ago. I just want to make one example about the code point unifiction issue in CJK. You really don't need to discuss the rest of the problem for a fixed issue. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few

about LCID and codepage!!!

2001-12-27 Thread Sujit K Singh \(Kundan\)
hi all can anybody tell me how can i get LCID and Codepage values for indic script kundan

RE: about LCID and codepage!!!

2001-12-27 Thread Maurice Bauhahn
Hello Kundan, I'm not sure what you are referring to in terms of LCID and Codepage values. I have used the ALA-LC Romanization Tables: Transliteration Schemes for Non-Roman Scripts 1997 Edition compiled and edited by Randall K. Barry ISBN 0-8444-0940-5 from http://www.powells.com

Re: about LCID and codepage!!!

2001-12-27 Thread Craig R. Cummings
Kundan, If you haven't been to Microsoft's GlobalDev web site yet, then you need to visit www.microsoft.com/globaldev. I found the following list of Windows 2000 and XP LCIDs from GlobalDev at the following URL: http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/nlsweb/default.asp I have also seen various

Re: Fact vs. fiction

2001-12-27 Thread Curtis Clark
At 06:25 PM 12/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You know you're spending too much time thinking about Unicode when you hear about the new Lord of the Rings movie and your first thought is about Tengwar and Cirth, the scripts invented by Tolkien and encoded in the ConScript Unicode Registry Would

Re: Character display problem example

2001-12-27 Thread Shigemichi Yazawa
At Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:35:21 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomohiro KUBOTA says, in the Debian introduction to i18n: An example of Han Unification is available at U+9AA8. This is a Kanji character for 'bone'. U+8FCE is an another example of a Kanji character for 'welcome'. The

Re: Character display problem example

2001-12-27 Thread Shigemichi Yazawa
At Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:04:32 -0500 (EST), Thomas Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, there are simply font differences. The latter form, with the diagonal strokes arranged like / \, is the more canonical form, typically seen in printing when using the kinds of fonts that you tested with.

Re: about LCID and codepage!!!

2001-12-27 Thread Yung-Fong Tang
You probably should also look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/charsets/charset4.asp Craig R. Cummings wrote: 007901c18f00$f51f3680$[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Kundan, If you haven't been to Microsoft's GlobalDev web site yet, then you need to visit

Re: PDUTR #25: Unicode Support for Mathematics

2001-12-27 Thread starner
If you want to define text/math, and provide the disappearing parenthesis and precedence tables and everything, then that's fine, but I don't see why it should be part of Unicode, anymore than full music rendering is part of Unicode. It's a higher level protocol. IMO, section 5 should not be