I'm referencing to a book entitled:
Памятники
Музея
Ізящныхъ
Іскусствъ
імені
ІмператораАлександра
III въ Москве.
I see that the the roman ordinal "third" can be encoded in a couple of
different ways:
- U+0049 U+0049 U+0049
- U+0406 U+0406 U+0406 (considering that this old russian orthograp
On 2003.03.05, 07:58, Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> In the Slovak orthography, the lowercase d, l and t are normally written
>> with the 'apostrophe' form of the accent.
>
> but only the printed version, not in handwriting
<...>
> In fact, the apostrophe form is used because ther
António Martins-Tuválkin schreef:
[quoting Radovan Garabik]
>> In fact, the apostrophe form is used because there is a lack of
>> convenient space to put carons over "tall" letters d,t,l, whereas
>> there is no problem with n,e,r.
Funny you should bring this subject back up. I never stopped
wonde
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:20:42PM +0100, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:
> On 2003.03.05, 07:58, Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >> In the Slovak orthography, the lowercase d, l and t are normally written
> >> with the 'apostrophe' form of the accent.
> >
> > but only the pri
António Martins-Tuválkin schreef:
> I'm referencing to a book entitled:
> Памятники
(etc, which translates into Памятники Музея Ізящныхъ
Іскусствъ імені
ІмператораАлександра III въ Москве)
> I see that the the roman ordinal "third" can be encoded in a
couple of different ways:
>
> - U+0049 U+00
From: "Pim Blokland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> António Martins-Tuválkin schreef:
>
> [quoting Radovan Garabik]
> >> In fact, the apostrophe form is used because there is a lack of
> >> convenient space to put carons over "tall" letters d,t,l, whereas
> >> there is no problem with n,e,r.
>
> Funny you
Pim Blokland posted:
However, having said all this, I'm not sure it's a Unicode issue.
What is to prevent font makers from creating fonts with glyphs that
look like ˇ for every caron? The Unicode Consortium doesn't force
the appearance of glyphs, only the font makers do.
Chapter 7 of the Unicode
Pim Blokland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. Encoded like that it may *look* like a roman three, but two of
> those are definitely not correct. Only U+2162 or its compatibility
> decomposition, U+0049 U+0049 U+0049 should be used. The other two
> are bad coding, just as using greek Iotas or combin
8 matches
Mail list logo
