Bhavin Sanghani wrote:
> I m giving entity in my xml file with these decimal values (e.g.
> ͞) and i convert it to html by applying css and xsl files.
> Now if proper unicode font is selected then it shows proper chars
> otherwise it shows question mark.
>
> So, following are some queries:
>
Peter Kirk wrote:
On 28/10/2003 18:49, Philippe Verdy wrote:
I just finished an Excel speadsheet that shows the Hebrew composition
model,
and all the problems caused by the canonical order of Hebrew diacritics.
In summary, most problems come from consonnant modifiers which have a
combining clas
John Hudson scripsit:
> I can't comment on the precise history of the canonical combining classes
> for Hebrew -- you'd need someone who was involved at the time --, but the
> canonical combining classes are particular to Unicode, although other and
> earlier character encoding standards may ha
Hi folks,
I m facing one problem to show pronounciation diacritic chars in browser
like double 'o' (decimal value 862)with overbar, reverse 'e' (decimal value
601), 'th' with underline (decimal values 863) etc...etc..
I m giving entity in my xml file with these decimal values (e.g. ͞)
and
Philippe Verdy scripsit:
> Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but nonets?
As others have written, the PDP-10/PDP-20 hardware is long obsolete.
However, there are still emulators running on modern 32-bit and 64-bit
hardware. That was the point of the remark about "the
Pub date = 1 April 2003.
I think that's the salient part.
Addison P. Phillips
Director, Globalization Architecture
webMethods | Delivering Global Business Visibility
http://www.webMethods.com
Chair, W3C Internationalization (I18N) Working Group
Chair, W3C-I18N-WG, Web Services Task Force
http://w
John Cowan wrote:
> > http://panda.com/tops-20/utf9.txt
> >
> > Res ipsa loquitur.
But apparently res ipsa non loquitur, because Phillipe continued:
>
> Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but nonets?
> i.e. 9-bit based platforms? If so this proposal makes sense, bu
From: "Stefan Persson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Philippe Verdy wrote:
> > Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but
nonets?
> > i.e. 9-bit based platforms? If so this proposal makes sense, but as a
local
> > optimization for these platforms. Problems will code if you want t
Philippe Verdy wrote:
Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but nonets?
i.e. 9-bit based platforms? If so this proposal makes sense, but as a local
optimization for these platforms. Problems will code if you want to
interchange this data with the large majority of hosts t
From: "John Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://panda.com/tops-20/utf9.txt
>
> Res ipsa loquitur.
Are there still now platforms where storage bytes are not octets but nonets?
i.e. 9-bit based platforms? If so this proposal makes sense, but as a local
optimization for these platforms. Problems wil
From: "Lars Marius Garshol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Does this make sense? Is "code point" the right term, or should I say
> "scalar value"? And what about "abstract character"? Are two equal
> sequences of code points in NFC necessarily composed of the same
> sequence of abstract characters?
As Uni
Philppe Verdy posted:
I do think the opposite: one can fold all commas below to cedillas by
default,
and, in a Romanian or Latvian context, fold all cedillas below to commas
below.
I see no difference.
Folding either way will find all occurrences of cedilla or comma below.
The direction of fold
* Lars Marius Garshol
|
| The definition currently says:
|
| String
| Strings are sequences of Unicode code points
| conforming to Unicode Normalization Form C .
* Kenneth Whistler
|
| I really think this is asking for trouble. A string data type should
| be specified in terms of specific
http://panda.com/tops-20/utf9.txt
Res ipsa loquitur.
--
I marvel at the creature: so secret and John Cowan
so sly as he is, to come sporting in the pool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
before our very window. Does he think that http://www.reutershealth.com
Men sleep without watch all night? --
Lars Marius Garshol asked:
> I'm working on a specification for a data model and would like to
> check that my definition of the string type makes sense.
Well, language designers and data modelers may want to chime in
with alternate opinions, but here is my two cents on this topic.
>
> The defi
I'm working on a specification for a data model and would like to
check that my definition of the string type makes sense.
The definition currently says:
String
Strings are sequences of Unicode code points
conforming to Unicode Normalization Form C .
Strings are equal if they consist
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: Merging combining classes, was: New contribution N2676
> I offered a suggestion on cedilla and combining undercomma:
>
> > / It seems to me that Cedil
Philippe Verdy scripsit:
> Can this link to CEN TC304 be updated ? Where can we find the results of its
> (past?) activities? In the ISO10646 repertoires collection?
The CEN Workshop Agreement defining MES-{1,2,3A,3B} can be found at
http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/cwa13873.pdf .
I offered a suggestion on cedilla and combining undercomma:
/ It seems to me that Cedilla/undercomma folding would be a useful /
/addition to "Character Foldings" at
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr30. /
and Philippe Verdy responded:
Excellent idea, however it has to be tailored by language:
Note that I can find some references for the MES-* subsets in Google, but in
various web sites, and I don't know which one is good and complete.
For example I have these summary pages for MES-1 and MES-2:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/mes-1-rationale.html
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/
> On 29/10/2003 15:07, John Cowan wrote:
>
> >Not necessarily. A process may check its input for normalization and
> >reject it if it is not normalized, and XML consumers are encouraged
> >(not required) to do so.
> >
> >
> >
> This looks to me like a clear breach of C9, at least of the derived
Just a little question: the unicode web site
(example at: http://www.unicode.org/timesens/calendar.html)
includes a link to what was supposed to be the information page for CEN
TC304 (European Standards): http://www.stri.is/TC304/default.html
This is no longer working, and even the Icelandic domai
Thanks Philippe
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> From: "Toyin Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Thank you Philippe. The characters you detailed below only seem to work in
> Word.
> > They don't work in DBArtisan or netscape messenger or outlook.
>
> There are a lot of applications that can use and render th
23 matches
Mail list logo
