From: "Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Michael is right, of course, that the differences between keyboards
> amount to more than just the basic layout and Shift and AltGr keys.
> There are custom shifting keys, dead keys, and unusual uses of Caps
> Lock, not to mention Far Eastern IMEs. But I d
Adam Twardoch wrote:
> Do you know if there are human-readable versions of Windows and/or
> MacOS keyboard layouts available somewhere?
>
> I'm looking for a way to compile a table that could look a bit like
> the following:
>
> Platform LanguageLayoutUnicodeKeystroke
> WindowsPol
Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
> Adam was looking for this work, already done. And he gave a sample of
> what he was hoping would exit, out in the wild.
What he said was, "I'm looking for a way to compile a table..."
> So I was merely pointing out a bunch of reasons why this was not a
> practic
Hello,
I am not sure if it is the proper place to discuss the case if missing
characters, but haven't found better place.
I tried to find out two characters in unicode and encountered the
following problem. There are two characters for logical EXISTS and FOR
ALL signs. There exists "old notati
Not Unicode, but... http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol9/issue1/palfreyman.html
- Message d'origine -
De: "Mirek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if it is the proper place to discuss the case if missing
> characters, but haven't found better place.
>
> I tried to find out two characters in unicode and encountered the
> following problem. There are tw
Dnia 2003-12-30 15:26, Użytkownik Patrick Andries napisał:
I tried to find out two characters in unicode and encountered the
following problem. There are two characters for logical EXISTS and FOR
ALL signs.
There exists "old notation" that is in unicode (exist =
mirrored E, for all = inverted A)
U
Mirek wrote:
Dnia 2003-12-30 15:26, Użytkownik Patrick Andries napisał:
Do you have any reference as to the modernity of this V-like notation ?
I made some investigations, when you asked about references and I found,
that V and inverted V symbols are not common, they are probably typicaly
polish
These can probably be used as glyph variants, i.e., by selecting a US vs. European font (or whatever
is the distinction).
I thought glyph variants were supposed to look at least somewhat similar.
--
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http:
Michael, Peter, and others:
Thank you for the responses.
I agree with Michael that the simplistic approach I have envisioned would be
rather incomplete -- I'm willing to accept that limitation. I am aware of
many issues involving IMEs, "chaining" dead keys etc. I would be willing to
leave them ou
I have found an interesting form of a power tower (_|, see the third line
here http://pages.infinit.net/hapax/images/puissances.jpg).
I was wondering if anyone else knew of other occurrences of this sign?
Many thanks,
Patrick
- Message d'origine -
De: "D. Starner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > These can probably be used as glyph variants, i.e., by selecting a US
vs. European font (or whatever
> > is the distinction).
>
> I thought glyph variants were supposed to look at least somewhat similar.
Any reference to th
At 03:34 PM 12/28/2003, Peter Kirk wrote:
It is very interesting to me that there does seem to have been a glyph
distinction (though a very subtle one) between sin and shin, in the
"serech" example
(http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il/orion/programs/Altman/serech.jpg) of what is
undoubtedly (in Unico
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
> Of Michael Everson
> To respond to Mark Shoulson, one could consider that Hitler's
> svastika was the logo of the National Socialist Party, and therefore
> should not be encoded.
IIRC, encoding of the Naz
From: "Adam Twardoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I agree with Michael that the simplistic approach I have envisioned would
be
> rather incomplete -- I'm willing to accept that limitation. I am aware of
> many issues involving IMEs, "chaining" dead keys etc. I would be willing
to
> leave them out of the
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Everson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The following story was forwarded to me. The "offending" characters
> in question are, I take it, the left-facing and right-facing swastika
> symbols, often used in Tibetan, found among the Chinese ideographs at
> U+
> > I thought glyph variants were supposed to look at least somewhat similar.
>
> Any reference to this similarity in appearance as a condition ?
>
> (Is the Sütterlin »e« a glyph variant of standard latin «e» then ? It does
> not ressemble any other "e" I know but rather an "n".)
>
> P.A.
Oka
On 30/12/2003 11:44, John Hudson wrote:
At 11:15 AM 12/30/2003, Peter Kirk wrote:
Even if it were verified, it isn't a good case for encoding a
separate character *equivalent* to a combination of two existing
characters: that's a glyph variant ligature.
Actually, I don't think so. The separat
> I wonder if there are other, better defined, cases of ligatures between
> base characters and diacritics in other scripts, i.e. cases where there
> is an optional alternative to base character plus diacritic which does
> not look like the base character plus the diacritic.
Devangari?
Sylla
Hi,
I’m facing
problem in handling problems in handling certain Unicode characters through
UTF-8 encoding in Netscape 4.75. Here goes the detail information on the
problem.
1. The characters
giving problem are Circled numbers (\u2460 to \u2469), Upper case Roman numbers
(\u2160 t
20 matches
Mail list logo
