Hello,
I am posting your problem to the Unicode mailing list
http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html. I hope someone on the
list will have a suggestion for your problem.
Regards,
Magda Danish
Administrative Director
The Unicode Consortium
+1 650-693-3921
-Original Message-
Was any decision made at the UTC meeting concerning Public Review Issue
#27? I ask because I am waiting to encode a text which needs to use ZWJ
and ZWNJ within combining character sequences (and for which there is
already publicly available font support!), but I don't want to do
anything which
text-content into the system, the characters are automatically
converted
into a unicode format by the Database, something like _#_1_2_4_6_4_;
This can happen (and is the correct action) when the character is not
part of the repertoire of the character encoding of the web page. Ensure
Was any decision made at the UTC meeting concerning Public Review Issue
#27? I ask because I am waiting to encode a text which needs to use ZWJ
and ZWNJ within combining character sequences (and for which there is
already publicly available font support!), but I don't want to do
anything
On 09/02/2004 14:25, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Was any decision made at the UTC meeting concerning Public Review Issue
#27? I ask because I am waiting to encode a text which needs to use ZWJ
and ZWNJ within combining character sequences (and for which there is
already publicly available font
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Peter Kirk
The UTC decided to allow ZWJ/ZWNJ to occur in combining character
sequences.
Thank you. So I can do what I was wanting to do (Hebrew meteg
combining
sequences) with a clear conscience!
Well, perhaps there is a step
On 09/02/2004 14:37, Peter Constable wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Peter Kirk
The UTC decided to allow ZWJ/ZWNJ to occur in combining character
sequences.
Thank you. So I can do what I was wanting to do (Hebrew meteg
Hello
I think I posted this to the list last week, but I haven't seen it come up.
I would like to present to the Unicode community some suggestions for
missing and mis-named characters related to the UCAS range. To properly
describe the kinds of characters missing etc., many graphics are
Peter C opined:
Well, perhaps there is a step that's needed to propose representations
for the alternate positions of meteg, one of these making use of ZWJ or
ZWNJ (whichever) and to get UTC to approve that so that it's formally a
part of the standard and, hence, an interoperable
Chris --
Note: I am not speaking officially, just giving my opinions.
> http://www.languagegeek.com/issues/ucas_unicode.html
Sorry I have no opinions at all about the major questions you are asking on the above page, and we probably need to involve some experts. The source documents for the
At 04:12 PM 2/9/2004, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
That leaves item A. And it is mostly a matter of determining
what is the best mechanism for getting people to know how
they should spell the metegs with the minimum of confusion.
Putting something in the Unicode Standard might be appropriate,
or there
Chris Harvey wrote:
I think I posted this to the list last week, but I haven't seen it come up.
You may have run up against the size of message constraints
currently imposed on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email list
because of the MyDoom virus.
Some comments on particular issues:
Misnamed
12 matches
Mail list logo
