> > In the .Net Framework, the string class (System
> > namespace) and the System.Globalization and System.Text
> > namespaces *are* designed to be aware of supplementary plane
> > characters.
> IMHO, that's a bit misleading. The String class itself does not appear
to
> be
> aware of SMP characte
Am 08.04.2004 um 06:32 schrieb Patrick Andries:
* The valid English names of ISO 10646 are defined in Annex L of
ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000(E)
Rule 1
By convention, only Latin capital letters A to Z, space, and hyphen
are used for writing the names of characters.
NOTE – Names of characters may also
At 09:11 PM 4/7/2004, Tobias Stamm wrote:
Greetings to all standartisers!
I'm new here so forgive me my stupidness.
I just have one little question to which I didn't found the answer in the
whole homepage:
What is the standard of the characters names?
You are looking for the character naming gu
Tobias Stamm a écrit :
Greetings to all standartisers!
I'm new here so forgive me my stupidness.
I just have one little question to which I didn't found the answer in
the whole homepage:
What is the standard of the characters names?
* The valid English names of ISO 10646 are defined in Annex
Greetings to all standartisers!
I'm new here so forgive me my stupidness.
I just have one little question to which I didn't found the answer in
the whole homepage:
What is the standard of the characters names?
What I mean is: For example, the character A has the name "LATIN
CAPITAL LETTER A".
At 13:29 -0700 2004-04-07, Richard Cook wrote:
I see. I assumed the codepoint assignments were already firm.
Never until the ballot is over.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
At 01:29 PM 4/7/2004, Richard Cook wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Peter Constable wrote:
> They were encoded that way some while before they were accepted in
> Unicode. Also, until Unicode 4.1 is published, there is a possibility
> that codepoints may change.
I see. I assumed the codepoint assignments
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Peter Constable wrote:
> They were encoded that way some while before they were accepted in
> Unicode. Also, until Unicode 4.1 is published, there is a possibility
> that codepoints may change.
I see. I assumed the codepoint assignments were already firm.
They were encoded that way some while before they were accepted in
Unicode. Also, until Unicode 4.1 is published, there is a possibility
that codepoints may change.
Peter
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
> -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Constable
> Sent: April 7, 2004 0:52
> To: Unicode Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Newbie questions: 1) Surrogates in WinXP? 2)
> Unicode in PostScript?
>
>
> In the .Net Framework, the string clas
On Apr 5, 2004, at 04:06 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
FYI, there is a new release (as of 1 April) of Doulos SIL at
http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSILfont, a free download, regular
typeface only.
BTW, this font has most of the recently-approved phonetic symbols
(encoded as PUA characters).
Peter,
Why
There's some discussion of support for supplementary-plane characters in
WinXP at
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/DrIntl/columns/018/default.mspx.
There are also slide decks from some relevant presentations at
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/presentations/23rd_Unicode_
Conf.mspx
12 matches
Mail list logo
