Asmus Freytag scripsit:
> >Is John Cowan's list supposed to be a complete list of
> >foldables for extant Hebrew code points?
>
> We know its not.
It lists all the characters which have points embedded in them.
If you map all those characters away and delete all explicit points and
accents, you
Elaine Keown
Tucson
Dear Mark and List:
I have even less of an idea than usual what on earth
you are all talking about, but
Today I am working on the 6th set of Hebrew
diacritics. They are called 'Palestinian' and are
found exclusively in the Cairo Genizah material.
The 'Cai
On 19/07/2004 23:23, Asmus Freytag wrote:
At 01:56 PM 7/19/2004, Mark Davis wrote:
You did point out an oversight; Asmus and I have been working on the
issue.
‎Mark
As Mark wrote, your point is taken and we've taken that onboard.
However, we won't try to *edit* text on the list, that's why we
At 01:56 PM 7/19/2004, Mark Davis wrote:
You did point out an oversight; Asmus and I have been working on the issue.
Mark
As Mark wrote, your point is taken and we've taken that onboard. However,
we won't try to *edit* text on the list, that's why we are not engaging in
a long discussion on the
You did point out an oversight; Asmus and I have been working on the issue.
âMark
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 13:21
Subject: Back to the subject: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence
I've been going through the Unicode BIDI Algorithm, and I'm having trouble
understanding the justification for the way rules W7 and N1 are formulated.
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#W7 says:
# W7. Search backwards from each instance of a European number until the first
# strong type (R, L, or
There has been extensive discussion in this thread on the specifics of
accent and diacritic folding. But no one has answered my point, repeated
below, that there seems to be a conflict between the folding algorithm
(rather than the details of specific foldings) and the principle of
canonical eq
05C0 is a punctuation mark often used in unpointed religious books to
indicate the end of the sentence, similar to a full stop.
05BE is the Hebrew hyphen.
Neither should be folded in the general case.
Jony
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
At 02:38 AM 7/19/2004, Michael Everson wrote:
At 22:25 -0400 2004-07-18, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
Though for all that, a lot of Yiddish I've seen is also written without
vowel-points. So the patah-alef and qamats-alef vowels, and the
yod-yod-patah vs. yod yod diphthongs, must be distinguished fro
On 19/07/2004 03:20, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
...
Jony's right: when it's down to brass tacks in Hebrew, it's consonants
and whitespace (and punctuation, I guess).
Agreed. But then there are a few characters which are not combining
marks but which are really part of the accent system and so shoul
At 22:25 -0400 2004-07-18, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
Though for all that, a lot of Yiddish I've seen is also written
without vowel-points. So the patah-alef and qamats-alef vowels, and
the yod-yod-patah vs. yod yod diphthongs, must be distinguished from
context, like everything else.
For much of
11 matches
Mail list logo
