Re: LuiseƱo Character S WITH STROKE

2004-10-15 Thread Edward H. Trager
On Thursday 2004.10.14 20:59:49 -0700, Doug Ewell wrote: Clark Cox clarkcox3 at gmail dot com wrote: The characters are majuscule S with a diagonal stroke, and minuscule s with a diagonal stroke. This letter is used to represent a voiceless retroflex fricative, which is distinct from the

June Hebrew ?

2004-10-15 Thread E. Keown
Elaine Keown Seattle 206 384 4349 Hi, I'm writing to inquire about the remaining steps to include the two June 2004 Hebrew items in the UCS. In June they were voted on positively by the American Redmond-Silicon Valley-based UTC and by the international JTC 1/SC2, the

Re: June Hebrew ?

2004-10-15 Thread E. Keown
Elaine Keown Seattle 206 384 4349 Dear Peter Constable and Lists: Peter Constable replied on the Unicode list: Which items? There were three at the June meeting: - atnah hafukh - lower dot and nun hafukha - qamats qatan Sorry--I was referring to those items

New translation posted

2004-10-15 Thread Magda Danish \(Unicode\)
A new translation of our web page What is Unicode? has been posted today. What is Unicode in Bulgarian was prepared by Mr. Ivan Neytchev and can be viewed at http://www.unicode.org/standard/translations/bulgarian.html. Thanks to all those who volunteered their time and effort, the number of

Re: Grapheme clusters

2004-10-15 Thread Mark E. Shoulson
Chris Harvey wrote: Hello everyone, Good news, the people working on the project have decided to go with a strategy which adheres to usual Unicode practice. There will be no letters in the PUA. They have given up on the backspacing idea and realised that just because /kw/ is one sound, it

Re: June Hebrew ?

2004-10-15 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Elaine, [Feel free to forward this on to the Hebrew lists you copied on your original inquiry, if you think it appropriate.] Peter Constable replied on the Unicode list: Which items? There were three at the June meeting: - atnah hafukh - lower dot and nun hafukha - qamats qatan

RE: [hebrew] Re: June Hebrew ?

2004-10-15 Thread Peter Constable
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of E. Keown No, the decisions regarding the characters above have already been made: WG2 approved these characters at their June meeting, I don't understand. In theory the standards world is international and has *some* checks