At 17:49 -0400 2004-10-21, Dean Snyder wrote:
>> 02BF MODIFIER LETTER LEFT HALF RING
Which is what I use (dating back from Unicode 3.0, where it was
specifically annotated). (I know authors who use superscript c as well.)
I personally agree with your choice - if I had to pick one Unicode
characte
Philipp Reichmuth wrote at 9:44 PM on Thursday, October 21, 2004:
>I'm not saying that half ring is the *only* way Ayin is transcribed.
>...
>However, I would say that left half ring is preferred, at least in works
>dealing with more than just Hebrew (supposing the character was
>available at al
Dean Snyder schrieb:
For Semitics at least, this is *not* a "left quotation mark"; people
normally use a left half ring wherever the character is available.
The following is a small and quickly generated sample list of
publications in which transliterated Semitic ayins are represented by
left singl
Dean Snyder schrieb:
For Semitics at least, this is *not* a "left quotation mark"; people
normally use a left half ring wherever the character is available.
The following is a small and quickly generated sample list of
publications in which transliterated Semitic ayins are represented by
left singl
Theo,
Further following up from what Mark Davis responded...
> Mark Davis wrote:
> > All comments are reviewed at the next UTC meeting. Due to the volume, we
> > don't reply to each and every one what the disposition was. If actions were
> > taken, they are recorded in the minutes of the meetings
Philipp Reichmuth wrote at 10:24 PM on Wednesday, October 20, 2004:
>For Semitics at least, this is *not* a "left quotation mark"; people
>normally use a left half ring wherever the character is available.
>(Take a look at Brill publications, such as the Encyclopaedia of Islam;
>Brill's Baskervill
On 21/10/2004 01:24, Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
Dean Snyder schrieb:
I think you will actually find little trace of the quotation mark for
Egyptian transliteration in published work although I look forward to
hearing of examples Dean! The modern Egyptian Ayin convention is
pretty much
established by
People get different things out of the printed book; I personally don't need
the code charts; I always look at online versions. But many people find
printed charts very useful; de gustibus non disputandum est.
As to the comments; this may seem recursive, but if you file an online
report requesting
Mark Davis wrote:
All comments are reviewed at the next UTC meeting. Due to the volume, we
don't reply to each and every one what the disposition was. If actions were
taken, they are recorded in the minutes of the meetings.
But what if an action was not taken. Do I have to keep reporting a particul
9 matches
Mail list logo
