Hi Lorna,
On 2011/08/25 22:17, Lorna Priest wrote:
> I suppose what I'd like is to be able to identify beginning and ending
> codepoints to search for, such as "F130..F32F" or something along that
> line.
You could use jEdit to search within a directory for "\p{Co}". This
would match ranges \uE0
2011/8/26 :
> The Unicode Technical Committee has posted a new issue for public review and
> comment. Details are on the following web page:
>
> http://www.unicode.org/review/pri202/
>
> Review periods for the new items close on October 24, 2011.
>
> Please see the page for links to discussion
On 8/26/2011 3:13 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Isn't there an intersection between NameAliases.txt proposed in
PRI202, and the informational table defined for UTR #25 at
http://www.unicode.org/Public/math/revision-12/MathClassEx-12.txt
which also lists other name aliases for other standards ?
No.
2011/8/27 Ken Whistler :
> On 8/26/2011 3:13 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>>
>> Isn't there an intersection between NameAliases.txt proposed in
>> PRI202, and the informational table defined for UTR #25 at
>> http://www.unicode.org/Public/math/revision-12/MathClassEx-12.txt
>> which also lists other n
On 8/26/2011 5:01 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
"we could as well include..." are dangerous words here. Going encyclopedic
> is*completely* at odds with the normative intention of NameAliases.txt.
Your statement then contradicts what PRI 202 says:
"the intent is to add various standard and de fact
Are name aliases exempted from the normal character naming conventions? I ask
because four of the entries have words that begin with numbers.
008E;SINGLE-SHIFT 2;control
008F;SINGLE-SHIFT 3;control
0091;PRIVATE USE 1;control
0092;PRIVATE USE 2;control
—Ben Scarborough
I agree with Ken that Phillipe's suggestion of conflating the
annotations for mathematical use with formal Unicode name aliases is a
non-starter. The former exist to help mathematicians identify symbols in
Unicode, when they know their name from entity lists. The latter are
designed to allow pr
2011/8/27 Asmus Freytag :
> I agree with Ken that Phillipe's suggestion of conflating the annotations
> for mathematical use with formal Unicode name aliases is a non-starter.
Yes but why then adding ISO 6429 alias names ? What makes ISO 6429 a
better choice than another ISO standard, that you wan
2011/8/27 Ken Whistler :
>> Was there such formal request from the ISO standard maintainers, and
>> an agreed policy ?
>
> It has nothing to do with ISO standard maintainers.
>
> And yes, there was a formal request to do something about this problem,
> but it came from one of the maintainers of Per
On 8/26/2011 10:09 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
2011/8/27 Asmus Freytag:
I agree with Ken that Phillipe's suggestion of conflating the annotations
for mathematical use with formal Unicode name aliases is a non-starter.
Yes but why then adding ISO 6429 alias names ? What makes ISO 6429 a
better cho
On 8/26/2011 7:52 PM, Benjamin M Scarborough wrote:
Are name aliases exempted from the normal character naming conventions? I ask
because four of the entries have words that begin with numbers.
008E;SINGLE-SHIFT 2;control
008F;SINGLE-SHIFT 3;control
0091;PRIVATE USE 1;control
0092;PRIVATE USE 2
> It would have the advantage of suppressing those names from the
> proposed table for UTR #25 (characters used in Mathematical
> notations).
>
> In the merged name aliases table, we could as well include :
> - SGML/HTML/XML character entity names (and some standardized synonyms) ?
HTML character
12 matches
Mail list logo
